- The eyes have it in these ‘Alita: Battle Angel’ memes 7 Years Ago
- Facebook let advertisers target users interested in infamous Nazis 7 Years Ago
- Dem senator promises to put net neutrality on the ‘political hot seat’ in coming months Today 1:28 PM
- Someone figured out that Toothless from ‘How to Train Your Dragon’ looks just like Bulbasaur Today 12:44 PM
- Disturbing Snapchat video shows 17-year-old throwing dog on trampoline Today 12:16 PM
- How to watch the new Bon Appetit channel for free Today 12:03 PM
- Eminem disses Netflix for canceling ‘The Punisher’ Today 11:50 AM
- Florida prisons sued for depriving inmates of music they paid for Today 11:36 AM
- Chris Hemsworth will become Hulk Hogan for Netflix biopic Today 11:29 AM
- Fortnite just introduced a K-Pop skin, and here’s how to unlock it Today 11:06 AM
- The YouTuber who exposed the site’s ‘softcore pedophile ring’ is under attack Today 10:39 AM
- Trump randomly calls for companies to ‘step up’ their 5G efforts in U.S. Today 10:28 AM
- Professional media person: Poor people have money but they just waste it on ‘benders’ Today 10:22 AM
- Netflix acquires highest-grossing blockbuster of 2019 (so far) Today 9:29 AM
- Ocasio-Cortez blasts media over home reports after Coast Guard member’s hit list revealed Today 8:52 AM
A newly leaked document has one European Association worried that there is a new version of the Anti-Counterfeiting Free Trade Agreement in the works.
Meet the new ACTA. Same as the old ACTA.
On the heels of news that a chief European Union advisor is officially condemning the Anti-Counterfeiting Free Trade Agreement (ACTA), a similar agreement already seems to be in the works.
The EDRi, a European advocacy group for digital rights has released what it says is a leaked outline for a new trade agreement that seeks to accomplish much of the same goals as ACTA.
The document is short and vague, but at least one key phrase already has caught the attention of those in the EDRi.
“Relevant parties,” it states, may be “informed if they may be supporting transactions involving counterfeit merchandise.”
While it’s unclear exactly why the document was written and what it may lead to (as a leaked document, it’s presumably unfinished), the EDRi thinks it bodes ill. It’s “simply an explicit expression of what many law-makers fail to see is implicit in ACTA – that global, almost entirely US-based companies, would be responsible for online policing – including being judge, jury and executioner wherever they see fit,” the EDRi writes.
In other words, they worry it hands too much power to the United States.
The document is listed as a proposal for the G8, which includes early ACTA signers like the United States, Canada and Japan. The EU, which now seems like it won’t ratify ACTA, isn’t a member of the G8, but it’s represented by the group.
At only two and a half pages long, the outline doesn’t offer a great deal of information or insight. The EDRi does praises it somewhat for narrowing its focus to cracking down on copyright infringement of tangible items, like counterfeit goods and pharmaceuticals. (ACTA’s critics complained that those suspected of downloading copyrighted materials would be subject to the same punishments as those who sold fake goods.)
However, the EDRi says, the new proposal still doesn’t objectively characterize the Internet. It notes that the G8 seems to have copied and pasted sentences from a U.S. Intellectual Property report.
Apparently that doesn’t count as copyright infringement.
Photo by Secretly Ironic
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.