- People are sharing how serving in the military has ruined their lives with #WhyIServe Sunday 5:31 PM
- Gillette ad showing a dad teaching his trans son how to shave has the internet in tears Sunday 4:34 PM
- 4chan’s new troll campaign aims to make the hashtag a white supremacist symbol Sunday 2:49 PM
- Here’s what that ‘cliff wife’ meme is all about Sunday 12:58 PM
- Artist suspended from Facebook, Instagram after posting anti-MAGA artwork Sunday 12:04 PM
- How to watch Serie A online for free Sunday 7:30 AM
- What does ‘uwu’ mean? Sunday 7:00 AM
- How to uninstall the Epic Games Launcher (for real) Sunday 6:30 AM
- How to watch the Indianapolis 500 online for free Sunday 6:00 AM
- Ohio KKK rally met with massive counter-protest and witty signs from local businesses Saturday 5:06 PM
- Guy who said he stole drugs from MS-13 now says viral story is fake Saturday 4:07 PM
- Financial service company left 885 million private records exposed online Saturday 3:13 PM
- Sasha Obama went to prom and Twitter is delighted with the photos Saturday 2:22 PM
- Jon Voight says Trump is the greatest president since Lincoln in Twitter videos Saturday 1:31 PM
- #DeleteFacebook gains momentum after the platform refused to remove doctored Nancy Pelosi videos Saturday 11:58 AM
Sarah Palin sues New York Times for defamation over editorial on political violence
Photo via Gage Skidmore/Flickr (CC-BY-SA)
The lawsuit claims the New York Times purposefully painted Palin in a negative light to make money.
Former vice presidential candidate and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin filed a lawsuit against the New York Times on Tuesday alleging that a recent editorial defamed her.
The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in New York, claims that a Times editorial on June 14 following the shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise (R-L.a.), the House majority whip, made a false link between the shooting of then-Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords by Jared Loughner in 2011 and a map Palin released of political districts with gun crosshairs over them.
By making the connection in the editorial, which immediately followed James Hodgkinson allegedly shooting Scalise and several others during a congressional baseball practice, Palin’s suit claims the Times “capitalized on Mrs. Palin’s name and Loughner’s and Hodgkinson’s horrific attacks to support its assertion that there was a ‘sickeningly familiar pattern’ of politically motivated violence against members of Congress.”
The suit claims that because the Times had posted several stories that acknowledged there was no connection between Palin and Loughner’s shooting in the past, the June 14 editorial was written to “implicitly” attack Palin’s conservative policies to drive “its digital advertising revenues at Mrs. Palin’s expenses.”
“The Times appreciates that in the increasingly competitive digital media landscape in which it finds itself, attacking Mrs. Palin brings an economic benefit to its business,” the suit claims.
The Times issued a correction to the editorial a day after publishing it, noting that “no such link was established” between Palin’s gun crosshairs ad and Giffords’ shooting.
— NYT Opinion (@nytopinion) June 15, 2017
The Times allegedly defamed the former governor because the newspaper “tended to injure Mrs. Palin in her trade, business or profession and directly implicated Mrs. Palin in a horrific crime,” the suit claims.
Palin is demanding a trial by jury and punitive damages in excess of $75,000.
The June 14 shooting of Scalise and four others left the House majority whip in critical condition. He underwent multiple surgeries and remains in a Washington, D.C., hospital, where he’s recovering from his injuries.
You can read the full lawsuit here:
Andrew Wyrich is a politics staff writer for the Daily Dot, covering the intersection of politics and the internet. Andrew has written for USA Today, NorthJersey.com, and other newspapers and websites. His work has been recognized by the Society of the Silurians, Investigative Reporters & Editors (IRE), and the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ).