- Alexis Bledel named most dangerous online celebrity 3 Years Ago
- Kylie Jenner trademarks ‘rise and shine’ after meme success 3 Years Ago
- ‘Watchmen’ website expands what you know about its alt-history 3 Years Ago
- Smoke ’em, pass ’em Week 8: Mark Walton szn 3 Years Ago
- Venmo’s first-ever credit card to launch in 2020 Today 3:46 PM
- Wet Kylo Ren may turn everyone to the dark side Today 3:15 PM
- Man allegedly targeted trans women on dating app, robbed them at knifepoint Today 3:02 PM
- Researchers expose how Amazon Echo and Google Home can steal passwords Today 2:47 PM
- Facebook removing Instagram Story filters that mimic plastic surgery Today 2:16 PM
- Mom solves ‘ghost baby’ image mystery after viral post Today 1:23 PM
- Elon Musk tweeted ‘through space’ Today 1:16 PM
- Don’t want a Fitbit? These step tracker apps got you covered Today 12:51 PM
- Protesters sing ‘Baby Shark’ to soothe frightened toddler Today 12:47 PM
- Who is Babu Frik, the adorable, teeny mechanic from ‘Rise of Skywalker’? Today 12:36 PM
- Senators push for social media data portability Today 12:11 PM
The document pinpoints how Moscow’s military allegedly used a mix of high technology and striking creativity to wage war in Ukraine, rehearse for fighting with the West, and even surpass British troops in the battlefield.
“In the unlikely event of a direct confrontation between NATO and RUS [Russia], we must acknowledge that RUS currently has a significant capability edge over U.K. force elements,” the paper read, according to the Times of London.
After a dramatic decline following the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia has spent the last decade rapidly growing their fighting power by mixing old-fashioned conventional weapons with some of the 21st century’s most devastating and innovative battlefield ideas: cyberwar, propaganda, psychological war, and more. The approach is commonly called “hybrid warfare.”
In Ukraine, the British report alleges that Russians used mass text messaging to sow chaos in communities where fighting was about to break out. They reportedly used acoustic locators to find hiding snipers; hacked the GPS of enemy troops, getting them lost on the way to the fight; and used civilians in efforts to intercept enemy communications.
By the middle of the last decade, the U.S. waged cyberwar against Iraqi and Afghani insurgents. Israel was accused of the same in a conflict with Syria. They also hacked Hezbollah television during war in Lebanon.
The 2008 conflict between Russia and Georgia was unprecedented in the scale of cyberwar. Attacks on dozens of websites owned by Georgian government, finance, and communications institutions began before the fighting and led to chaos and confusion once the ground war truly broke out. Hackers accessed and stole military and political intelligence from Georgian networks, while Georgia’s own hackers were hamstrung by denial-of-service attacks against their community websites to prevent counter-attacks.
These tactics are increasingly common around the world and, as cyberwar rapidly evolves, hackers become more potent. But Russia is one of the most effective and innovative forces in cyberspace—U.S. authorities claim the Kremlin was behind the recent hack of the Democratic National Committee, for example—occupying a tier of power and action not too far from the United States, another cyber superpower that can throw its weight around the world through the internet.
Update 1:50pm CT, Aug. 11: Added additional context regarding U.S.-waged cyberattacks and Russian conflicts.
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.