- Witness the wholesome magic of inter-generational conversations on r/AskOldPeople 1 Year Ago
- How to watch Paramount Network online for free Today 5:30 AM
- People are sharing how serving in the military has ruined their lives with #WhyIServe Sunday 5:31 PM
- Gillette ad showing a dad teaching his trans son how to shave has the internet in tears Sunday 4:34 PM
- 4chan’s new troll campaign aims to make the hashtag a white supremacist symbol Sunday 2:49 PM
- Here’s what that ‘cliff wife’ meme is all about Sunday 12:58 PM
- Artist suspended from Facebook, Instagram after posting anti-MAGA artwork Sunday 12:04 PM
- How to watch Serie A online for free Sunday 7:30 AM
- What does ‘uwu’ mean? Sunday 7:00 AM
- How to uninstall the Epic Games Launcher (for real) Sunday 6:30 AM
- How to watch the Indianapolis 500 online for free Sunday 6:00 AM
- Ohio KKK rally met with massive counter-protest and witty signs from local businesses Saturday 5:06 PM
- Guy who said he stole drugs from MS-13 now says viral story is fake Saturday 4:07 PM
- Financial service company left 885 million private records exposed online Saturday 3:13 PM
- Sasha Obama went to prom and Twitter is delighted with the photos Saturday 2:22 PM
Leaked Facebook training manual says white nationalism gets a pass
Facebook has clarified its positions on hate speech on its platform, according to documents obtained by Motherboard.
In the wake of the Charlottesville, Virginia, protests in August, Facebook added to its training manual for moderators on the social networking site, focusing on white supremacists. The new guidelines differentiate between white supremacy—not allowed—and white nationalism or separatism, which is allowed on Facebook.
According to the documents, Facebook groups accounts and their content according to strong, medium, and weak “signals.” For example, a KKK leader or other avowed member of a white supremacist group would be a strong signal and would require action from moderators.
Facebook judges content on a number of signals, including whether or not the account or post has called for violence against protected groups. But it won’t take action against accounts for calling for a white ethnostate, stating that white nationalism is “extreme right movement and ideology, but it doesn’t seem to be always associated with racism (at least not explicitly).”
But Facebook does acknowledge that white supremacist and white nationalist or separatist sentiments do converge, thus making some speech difficult to classify.
“Overlaps with white nationalism/separatism, even orgs and individuals define themselves inconsistently,” the manual says.
Facebook has previously faced criticism for its handling of hate speech. In April, Zuckerberg apologized for the company’s hate speech policies which activists said led to violence against the Rohingya people of Myanmar. And a 2017 ProPublica report showed how the social network’s censors were trained to remove offensive content—an algorithm that ultimately allowed hate speech against multiple minority groups.
See the full report here.
Ellen Ioanes is the FOIA reporter at the Daily Dot, where she covers U.S. politics. She is a graduate of Columbia Journalism School, and her work has appeared in the Guardian, the Center for Public Integrity, HuffPost India, and more.