- Twitter lifts ‘permanent’ suspension of activist Barrett Brown Monday 5:52 PM
- Billie Eilish fans fend off objectifying comments on tank top photo Monday 5:32 PM
- Groom’s mother sabotages wedding by tricking guests into wearing jorts and hoodies Monday 4:39 PM
- No one believes Bill de Blasio’s son sent him these debate prep texts Monday 3:26 PM
- Meek Mill, Jay-Z to release ‘Free Meek’ documentary on Amazon Prime Monday 3:20 PM
- 3 ways to secure your Nest cameras Monday 3:15 PM
- This Pokémon generator site is creating hilarious monsters Monday 2:48 PM
- MrBeast impersonator tricks kid into destroying his XBox Monday 12:50 PM
- This mom has the perfect nickname for her nonbinary kid Monday 12:25 PM
- Netflix tests pop-out player that will allow viewers to multitask Monday 11:44 AM
- Man allowed to sue media publishers over readers’ Facebook comments Monday 11:42 AM
- Republicans slammed for joke about ‘heavily armed militia’ at Oregon statehouse Monday 11:30 AM
- New bill wants tech companies to tell you how much your data is worth Monday 10:53 AM
- AOC has the best response to Steve King’s ‘concentration camp’ criticism Monday 10:19 AM
- Did Jake Paul and Tana Mongeau just get engaged? Monday 9:26 AM
Dutch intelligence chief calls for backdoors into encrypted chat apps
The push for weakening encryption is picking up more steam around the globe.
Citing an unprecedented threat of attack against the Netherlands, the head of Dutch intelligence says he wants to be able to read encrypted chat apps.
Backdoors into encrypted chat apps, such as WhatsApp and Telegram, are essential for “protecting the legal order,” Rob Bertholee, head of the Netherlands’ General Intelligence and Security Service, told Dutch media
Bertholee’s statements puts him at an opposing end to his country’s ruling government. Earlier this year, the Dutch government backed strong encryption and strongly condemned the idea of backdoors.
The Dutch executive cabinet endorsed “the importance of strong encryption for Internet security to support the protection of privacy for citizens, companies, the government, and the entire Dutch economy,” Ard van der Steur, the Dutch minister of security and justice, wrote in a January 2016 statement. “Therefore, the government believes that it is currently not desirable to take legal measures against the development, availability and use of encryption within the Netherlands.”
Bertholee specifically criticized this position, calling it “undesirable” and warned that it will mean “we are no longer able to read the communication of terrorists.”
Weakening encryption poses numerous challenges. A vast array of privacy advocates and technologists warn doing so will, among other consequences, expose internet traffic to hacking, posing an enormous threat to the privacy of individuals, companies, and governments online.
Bertholee’s comments come as the encryption debate is slowly heating up around the world once again.
In the U.S., law enforcement and intelligence brass like FBI director James Comey continue to argue for backdoors into encryption. That idea has lost significant steam since last year in the White House, Congress, and Department of Defense.
While the White House has come out explicitly against such legislation in America, they have a new tactic: “Quiet conversation” with Silicon Valley companies to help on a case-by-case basis.
It’s not at all clear yet what that means except that the opaque new intimacy between Washington and Silicon Valley represents a potential new front in the Crypto Wars.
Patrick Howell O'Neill is a notable cybersecurity reporter whose work has focused on the dark net, national security, and law enforcement. A former senior writer at the Daily Dot, O'Neill joined CyberScoop in October 2016. I am a cybersecurity journalist at CyberScoop. I cover the security industry, national security and law enforcement.