- Reddit Relationships: Man laughs at girlfriend for using Microsoft PowerPoint during sex Thursday 8:59 PM
- The 15 Brad Pitt movies you need to see now, ranked Thursday 8:26 PM
- Facebook could face legal action over the Area 51 event Thursday 6:50 PM
- How to stream Texans vs. Chargers in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 6:40 PM
- Tekashi 69 alleges Cardi B was a Bloods gang member Thursday 5:55 PM
- Right-wing sites falsely claimed group of Somalis attacked man in viral video Thursday 5:00 PM
- Big creators risk losing checkmarks amid YouTube verification purge Thursday 4:56 PM
- How to stream Eagles vs. Lions in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 4:52 PM
- How to stream Steelers vs. 49ers in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 4:10 PM
- How to stream Bills vs. Bengals in NFL Week 3 action Thursday 4:03 PM
- Colt halts production of AR-15s for civilians Thursday 3:45 PM
- If you love long-winded, hashtag-heavy Instagram captions, these apps can help Thursday 2:54 PM
- Teen girls on TikTok have convinced the internet that they eat their tampons Thursday 2:33 PM
- Twitch streamer faces criticism for trying to defend racist jokes Thursday 2:03 PM
- How to stream Raiders vs. Vikings in Week 3 Thursday 12:55 PM
A report documenting the ongoing struggle to keep a Black female scientist’s Wikipedia page highlights how much more work the platform needs to do to tackle its diversity problem.
A piece republished by Slate documents the journey of Clarice Phelps, likely the first Black woman to have contributed to the discovery of a new element, whose Wikipedia page keeps getting deleted. A page under her name on Wikipedia said it had been deleted when the Daily Dot ran the search on Sunday afternoon. The “move log” read that an administrator had “protected” the page because it had been “Repeatedly recreated” and was “in violation of a deletion discussion that was upheld at deletion review.”
The drive to get Phelps’ name on Wikipedia was initiated by a Jess Wade, a postdoctoral researcher in physics in the U.K., who has a mission to make women scientists visible on the internet—starting with their Wikipedia pages, which many people rely on for information. Wade, said she made almost 300 Wikipedia pages for women scientists in one year, told the Guardian that this was her way of contributing to increasing the representation women scientists on the internet.
“I kind of realized we can only really change things from the inside,” she said in July 2018. “Wikipedia is a really great way to engage people in this mission because the more you read about these sensational women, the more you get so motivated and inspired by their personal stories.”
She created Phelps’ page after a journalist had reached out to her and notified her about Phelps’ work, according to Slate. In February, smack in the middle of Black History Month, Phelps’ bio was deleted for not having enough mention of her work elsewhere. It was reportedly flagged by an anonymous user, which is allowed on Wikipedia. According to Slate, the user was not particularly active otherwise.
Wikipedia, as a “crowdfunded Encyclopedia,” has options for other users to flag its content, but can choose to respond (or not) to these flags. In this case, they did.
Wade put a call out on Twitter in September in order to gain more links and sources to her work:
But a common problem lay in the fact that systematic discrimination against women and, specifically women of color, in the sciences meant her work hadn’t been celebrated in the mainstream press the way that of her white, male counterparts had.
hitting on the key problem - she's not been celebrated in standard press. But what an incredible achievement to discover an element. Hope your page inspires more celebration of her work #womeninSTEM #blackandSTEM— Jen (@DrJenBaker) September 3, 2018
Even though she received a mention for being a part of the team that discovered the new element on the periodic table, some felt it odd that her name wasn’t mentioned on the list of authors.
tho that article is ambiguous about whether she was part of team when it was actually discovered...— Egon Willighⓐgen (@egonwillighagen) September 8, 2018
It took Wikipedia a little over a week to take the page down after it was flagged. Wikipedia itself acknowledges that its editors are predominantly men, and the kind of systematic bias it can perpetuate. “This has led to Wikipedia having fewer and less extensive articles about women or topics important to women,” the site’s “Gender bias on Wikipedia” section reads. Even though it says that the Wikimedia company has made “made an ongoing attempt to increase female editorship of Wikipedia,” the story of Clarice Phelps shows Wikipedia still has a very long way to go.
Wikimedia did not immediately respond to the Daily Dot’s request for comment.
Samira Sadeque is a New York-based journalist reporting on immigration, sexual violence, and mental health, and will sometimes write about memes and dinosaurs too. Her work also appears in Reuters, NPR, and NBC among other publications. She graduated from Columbia Journalism School, and her work has been nominated for SAJA awards. Follow: @Samideque