- ‘American Dirt’ controversy inspires meme about Latinx stereotypes in literature Wednesday 9:02 PM
- What is the TikTok ‘flex challenge’? Wednesday 8:03 PM
- GoFundMe to send ‘Target Tori’ on vacation raises more than $30K Wednesday 6:54 PM
- Furries stop domestic assault in viral video Wednesday 6:10 PM
- Gritty under police investigation for allegedly punching a teen fan Wednesday 6:04 PM
- Twitter users throw animal parties with emoji in new meme Wednesday 5:21 PM
- Woman who went viral supporting Soleimani killing exposed as Libyan militia lobbyist Wednesday 5:01 PM
- Jeff Bezos subtweets Saudi prince following phone hack report Wednesday 3:29 PM
- ‘Yeah, good. OK’ Bernie Sanders meme is a new way to dismiss people Wednesday 3:10 PM
- ‘Vanderpump Rules’ recap: Petty displays of affection Wednesday 2:12 PM
- Makeup artist transforms into Timothée Chalamet on TikTok Wednesday 1:54 PM
- Iguanas are falling from trees—and people are selling them online for food Wednesday 1:02 PM
- 75,000 sign petition to fire Wendy Williams after ‘cleft lip’ comment about Joaquin Phoenix Wednesday 12:30 PM
- Kim Kardashian says Kylie Jenner’s setting spray is ‘cheap sh*t’ Wednesday 11:59 AM
- Trump continues to demand Apple unlock iPhones for the government Wednesday 11:46 AM
Amidst the Trump administration’s rollback of transgender protections, the U.S. Supreme Court has rejected hearing a contentious trans bathroom Supreme Court case, sending it back to the lower courts.
The case involves transgender 17-year-old Gavin Grimm who was challenging a Gloucester County School Board policy that forces trans students to use gender-segregated facilities based on their assigned sex at birth. The ACLU filed the original lawsuit on Grimm’s behalf and defended him.
Grimm won the initial federal appeals court case, with the court ruling that the federal government was probably violating Title IX by forcing him to access a bathroom that did not coincide with his gender identity. However, to clarify Title IX’s protections for gender identity, the appeals court called on the federal government to define whether Title IX protects against discrimination for gender identity, not just sex at birth, in the U.S. educational system.
Bloomberg reports that the Obama administration’s trans protections letter was a significant part of the appeals court ruling. Now that the Trump administration changed the federal government’s policy, the Supreme Court has effectively wiped out the original ruling. Grimm will now be brought back to the lower court, where the question of gender identity in relation to Title IX will be addressed.
Because the Supreme Court rejected the original appeals court ruling, this also means that Grimm isn’t protected by law to use gender-segregated facilities at school that align with his gender identity.
Before the Supreme Court passed on the case, 18 states supporting Gavin Grimm filed a friend-of-the-court brief. The amici curiae included California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Pennsylvania, Washington, D.C., and Virginia—which is home to the Gloucester County School Board. New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson led the filing.
“Providing transgender students access to bathrooms that align with their gender identity isn’t just the right thing to do—it’s the law,” Attorney General Schneiderman said, according to BuzzFeed News. “My office won’t hesitate to act to make sure all students are treated with dignity and fairness.”
H/T Bradd Jaffy
Ana Valens is a reporter specializing in online queer communities, marginalized identities, and adult content creation. She is Daily Dot's Trans/Sex columnist. Her work has appeared at Vice, Vox, Truthout, Bitch Media, Kill Screen, Rolling Stone, and the Toast. She lives in Brooklyn, New York, and spends her free time developing queer adult games.