- What is “TikTok including Musical.ly”? Tuesday 8:48 PM
- Video shows driver yelling N-word at Black woman in road rage incident Tuesday 7:40 PM
- A fan gifted Billie Eilish a jacket–it ended up in a thrift store for another fan to find Tuesday 6:49 PM
- Fans are surprisingly hyping Moby up for his new vegan tattoo Tuesday 6:13 PM
- Suspicionless searches of travelers’ electronics ruled unconstitutional Tuesday 5:22 PM
- Facebook testing TikTok clone within Instagram called Reels Tuesday 5:11 PM
- Han Solo shooting scene changed yet again, spawning ‘Maclunkey’ memes Tuesday 4:52 PM
- Facebook bug opened iPhone cameras while users scrolled their feeds Tuesday 4:36 PM
- Black Facebook employees say company racism has ‘gotten worse’ Tuesday 4:01 PM
- This fish with a ‘human face’ is here to give you nightmares Tuesday 3:28 PM
- TikTok’s piercing challenge leaves the fate of your face up to a filter Tuesday 2:54 PM
- Soldiers with top-secret clearance say they were ordered to install a sketchy app Tuesday 2:46 PM
- How to take your Korean beauty routine on the go Tuesday 2:24 PM
- Disney+’s ‘Encore!’ is a love letter to high school theater Tuesday 2:15 PM
- White tourist filmed shouting homophobic, racist slurs Tuesday 1:31 PM
The age of the URL may be ending, if Google has anything to do with it. The Google Chrome team is investigating URL alternatives that could make internet browsing easier and safer.
One of the problems Chrome engineers see is that it’s becoming more and more difficult to differentiate between a legitimate website URL and an imitation (which is often used in phishing attempts). With the rise in more varied domain extensions—besides .com or .org, you can get a .cafe, .fail, or .wtf website—a careless eye could easily mistake a faux site for the real thing. It can also make it difficult to guess a business’ domain. In the old days, a majority of sites were simply “business name” followed by .com. Nowadays, there’s huge variety in the structure of URLs.
“We want to move toward a place where web identity is understandable by everyone—they know who they’re talking to when they’re using a website and they can reason about whether they can trust them,” Google Chrome engineering manager Adrienne Porter Felt told Wired. “But this will mean big changes in how and when Chrome displays URLs.”
At the moment, the Chrome team is merely exploring different URL alternatives and how they could be implemented. It also isn’t sharing details about what those alternatives could be. Google should have more finalized ideas they’re considering later this year or early next year. The Chrome team knows that whatever alternative they settle on, it will end up being controversial.
However, they feel the work is important: “Everyone is unsatisfied by URLs,” Chrome director of engineering Parisa Tabriz told Wired. “They kind of suck.”
Google has already taken steps towards “killing” the URL in the past. In 2014, it began eliminating the “http://” from the URL bar. Since then, it’s also used the URL bar to highlight the HTTPS in secure sites, and also flag sites that don’t use the HTTPS protocol.
H/T Business Insider
Christina Bonnington is a tech reporter who specializes in consumer gadgets, apps, and the trends shaping the technology industry. Her work has also appeared in Gizmodo, Wired, Refinery29, Slate, Bicycling, and Outside Magazine. She is based in the San Francisco Bay Area and has a background in electrical engineering.