- Report: DACA recipients increasingly being denied federal housing loans Friday 3:54 PM
- Chris Christie is finally getting praise—for turning down Donald Trump Friday 3:39 PM
- Net neutrality died last year. But the fight’s just begun Friday 1:18 PM
- Kim Kierkegaardashian creator says popular Twitter account ‘speaks to the duality in all of us’ Friday 1:02 PM
- Facebook admits that 6.8 million users’ private photos were exposed Friday 12:55 PM
- YouTube reviewer heads to homeless shelter to critique the food Friday 12:46 PM
- Viral video shows Brooklyn woman’s racist tirade and violent attack Friday 12:38 PM
- 7-year-old migrant girl dies in Border Patrol custody Friday 11:31 AM
- People are losing it after hearing the end of Ariana Grande’s new song ‘Imagine’ Friday 11:28 AM
- Failed Green party candidate was secretly behind this popular QAnon account Friday 11:05 AM
- Dude gets dunked on for claiming Keira Knightley’s ‘six pack’ makes her trans Friday 10:52 AM
- A theoretical tax on Bud Light has infuriated conservatives Friday 10:10 AM
- Tumblr is back on the iOS App Store as NSFW content ban looms Friday 10:10 AM
- Here’s why YouTube deleted 58 million videos and a ton of accounts Friday 9:43 AM
- The 25 worst passwords of 2018 Friday 9:27 AM
Google engineers are reimagining a URL-less future.
The age of the URL may be ending, if Google has anything to do with it. The Google Chrome team is investigating URL alternatives that could make internet browsing easier and safer.
One of the problems Chrome engineers see is that it’s becoming more and more difficult to differentiate between a legitimate website URL and an imitation (which is often used in phishing attempts). With the rise in more varied domain extensions—besides .com or .org, you can get a .cafe, .fail, or .wtf website—a careless eye could easily mistake a faux site for the real thing. It can also make it difficult to guess a business’ domain. In the old days, a majority of sites were simply “business name” followed by .com. Nowadays, there’s huge variety in the structure of URLs.
“We want to move toward a place where web identity is understandable by everyone—they know who they’re talking to when they’re using a website and they can reason about whether they can trust them,” Google Chrome engineering manager Adrienne Porter Felt told Wired. “But this will mean big changes in how and when Chrome displays URLs.”
At the moment, the Chrome team is merely exploring different URL alternatives and how they could be implemented. It also isn’t sharing details about what those alternatives could be. Google should have more finalized ideas they’re considering later this year or early next year. The Chrome team knows that whatever alternative they settle on, it will end up being controversial.
However, they feel the work is important: “Everyone is unsatisfied by URLs,” Chrome director of engineering Parisa Tabriz told Wired. “They kind of suck.”
Google has already taken steps towards “killing” the URL in the past. In 2014, it began eliminating the “http://” from the URL bar. Since then, it’s also used the URL bar to highlight the HTTPS in secure sites, and also flag sites that don’t use the HTTPS protocol.
H/T Business Insider
Christina Bonnington is a tech reporter who specializes in consumer gadgets, apps, and the trends shaping the technology industry. Her work has also appeared in Gizmodo, Wired, Refinery29, Slate, Bicycling, and Outside Magazine. She is based in the San Francisco Bay Area and has a background in electrical engineering.