- What exactly is ‘too adult’ for Disney+? 6 Years Ago
- How tall is Michael Bloomberg? 6 Years Ago
- The ’24 hours to respond’ meme holds celebrities to a higher standard Monday 8:46 PM
- Twitter users miss the kids who walked in on their dad’s interview Monday 8:40 PM
- ‘The Thing About Men’ Twitter hashtag is full of sarcasm and misogyny Monday 7:27 PM
- This woman said Hillary Clinton losing the 2016 election gave her PTSD, and people are furious Monday 6:45 PM
- Vanessa Bryant files a lawsuit against helicopter company after deaths of Kobe and Gianna Monday 5:49 PM
- Michael Jordan cries at Kobe Bryant memorial, jokes about creating a new meme Monday 4:43 PM
- Woman’s boyfriend says it’s him or the frogs—Reddit says choose the frogs Monday 4:22 PM
- Greyhound buses will no longer allow Border Patrol checks Monday 4:04 PM
- ‘Eat Them To Defeat Them’ is oddly about vegetables—not about eating the rich Monday 3:26 PM
- Marco Rubio mocked for filming talking while driving socialism critique Monday 2:54 PM
- QAnon believer asks Trump’s campaign press secretary who Q is Monday 2:36 PM
- Octavia Spencer has discovered ‘Ma’ memes—and she can’t get enough Monday 2:09 PM
- Meet the anti-Greta Thunberg, a climate ‘skeptic’ funded by the oil industry Monday 1:12 PM
This browser extension will literally change the way you read the Internet
“That’s literally all it does.”
There’s a lot of improper usage on the Internet, and some people literally can’t even with it. Fortunately, now they don’t have to. This new Chrome extension from developer Mike Walker replaces every instance of “literally” with “figuratively.”
“That’s literally all it does,” reads the Chrome Web Store description.
This might be good for a few laughs, if you’re the kind of pedant you finds this kind of thing funny. But replacing every “incorrect” use of a word with its (ostensible) opposite is not really the best way to help folks to use language more precisely. Surely there are, after all, instances of the word “literally” on the Internet where its use is not, indeed, figurative.
Most of the time, when people use “literally,” they really mean “actually.” “I literally filed this story in 20 minutes,” for instance.
I have no qualms with those who aspire to conform their sentences to proper grammar and syntax, but to unequivocally condemn the use—or overuse—of a particular word seems horribly misguided. Critics of “literally” (ahem) mistake hyperbole for improper usage.
There is not, in fact, anything grammatically wrong with claiming that someone is “literally Hitler.” If one were to claim that the same person was figuratively Hitler, would that really be any better? And for that matter, who is Mike Walker—or anyone—to declare “figuratively” the necessary antonym of “literally”? It’s a reasonable inference but one that does not hold up under scrutiny.
Any comparison of someone or something to Hitler is necessarily hyperbolic. As such, one could argue that to say someone is “literally Hitler” is more accurate because it is, indeed, more explicitly hyperbolic.
Language is an imprecise thing, a broken system for conveying meaning and intent, full of potholes and traps and cracks that readers, speakers, and writers are never not navigating. We need not be constantly aware of this process, because we come to be aware of it only when the exchange breaks down, when we are misunderstood. Meaning is something to be midwifed, not blacksmithed. Figuratively.
Brendan O’Connor is a technology and politics reporter. In April 2016, he joined Gawker Media Group as a staff writer, where he covers the alt-right for its special projects desk.