- Billie Eilish fans riot after being referred to as ‘Avocados’ Sunday 4:37 PM
- Beyhive coming for Sainsbury’s supermarket over Ivy Park shade Sunday 3:17 PM
- Antique store blasted for selling ‘white only’ signs Sunday 1:45 PM
- DaBaby explains altercation with hotel employee after video goes viral Sunday 12:32 PM
- Kanye faces backlash for headlining Christian event with anti-LGBTQ leaders Sunday 10:31 AM
- Why is Yennefer of Vengerberg so different in Netflix’s ‘The Witcher’? Sunday 10:00 AM
- Actress slammed for ‘acid attack-face’ TikTok challenge Sunday 9:46 AM
- ‘Weathering With You’ blends fantasy and realism in a magical love story Saturday 6:18 PM
- Kidnapped teen used Snapchat to get rescued Saturday 4:35 PM
- What fans do and don’t want to see in future ‘Far Cry’ installments Saturday 4:26 PM
- Aaron Carter accused of stealing lion art for merch Saturday 3:10 PM
- Instagram’s hidden like counts were inspired by a ‘Black Mirror’ episode Saturday 2:06 PM
- Student says they were expelled for tricking teacher into making inappropriate TikTok Saturday 12:26 PM
- Space Force uniforms relentlessly mocked, memed Saturday 10:52 AM
- Man flamed after admitting he called police on Target employee over a toothbrush Saturday 9:10 AM
The Post‘s report tells of a mysterious data center built in Midlothian, Texas, by a developer called Sharka LLC.
Officials working on the project were sworn to secrecy about the company behind it, according to the Post, until after the deal went through.
Google received $10 million in tax breaks for that project alone, according to the Post, and it used more than one shell company to negotiate the deal; in addition to Sharka LLC, Google also used the company name Jet Stream LLC to purchase the land on which the center was built. The company followed a similar practice in Iowa, according to the Post, using two companies, Questa LLC and Gable Corp., to negotiate the construction of a data center in Council Bluffs.
The report also cites Google’s heavy use of non-disclosure agreements, or NDAs, as an impediment to input for the communities where it builds its projects.
Google did not respond to the Daily Dot’s request for comment on this story. In a statement to the Post, Google spokeswoman Katherine Williams said,
“We believe public dialogue is vital to the process of building new sites and offices, so we actively engage with community members and elected officials in the places we call home.
“In a single year, our data centers created $1.3 billion in economic activity, $750 million in labor income, and 11,000 jobs throughout the United States. Of course, when we enter new communities we use common industry practices and work with municipalities to follow their required procedures.”
The Post points out that the data centers are vulnerable to attack, and that corporations have concerns about trade secrets to consider. But the secretive nature of the deals, stretching as far back as 2006, prevented a public comment process in many cases, even though the new sites use municipal resources.
The revelations about Google come on the heels of Amazon’s announcement that it would pull out of a deal to open a second headquarters in Long Island City, Queens. The negotiations to build the outpost were reportedly similarly secretive, leading to bills in both the New York City and New York state government seeking an end to such cloak-and-dagger practices, according to the New York Times.
Read the full report here.
H/T Washington Post
Ellen Ioanes is the FOIA reporter at the Daily Dot, where she covers U.S. politics. She is a graduate of Columbia Journalism School, and her work has appeared in the Guardian, the Center for Public Integrity, HuffPost India, and more.