- Don Cheadle made important fashion choices on ‘SNL’ 1 Year Ago
- Why the Twitter left loves to dunk on Max Boot Today 6:30 AM
- How to watch ‘Last Week Tonight with John Oliver’ online for free Today 6:30 AM
- How to stream Francis Ngannou vs. Cain Velasquez for free Today 6:00 AM
- How to stream the 2019 Daytona 500 for free Today 5:50 AM
- 7-year-old YouTuber to get his own show on Nickelodeon Saturday 5:30 PM
- ‘Hipster’ jobs are trending, and Indeed says the market is booming Saturday 3:33 PM
- Trump meme removed after copyright complaint Saturday 2:15 PM
- Facebook pushes back against moderators complaining about ‘Big Brother’ environment Saturday 12:46 PM
- Twitter hid post from an account linked to Iran’s Supreme Leader Saturday 10:17 AM
- How to stream Leo Santa Cruz vs. Rafael Rivera for free Saturday 8:00 AM
- ‘Larry Charles’ Dangerous World of Comedy’ finds the balance between tragedy and comedy Saturday 7:30 AM
- How to stream Michael ‘Venom’ Page vs. Paul Daley for free Saturday 7:00 AM
- How to watch the NBA Dunk Contest 2019 online for free Saturday 6:50 AM
- The best new TV shows to stream this weekend Saturday 6:00 AM
Photo via antb/Shutterstock (Licensed)
Filed by a group bluntly named “Google You Owe Us,” the suit seeks compensation for 5.4 million people in Britain it claims were affected. Google is accused of bypassing security settings found in Safari, the iPhone’s default web browser. It allegedly used a “piece of code” that exploited a vulnerability in the browser, granting them access to sensitive user information, like browsing history, IP addresses, and approximate location.
Google then allegedly sold that information to advertisers.
“I believe that what Google did was simply against the law. Their actions have affected millions, and we’ll be asking the courts to remedy this major breach of trust,” Richard Lloyd, former executive director of consumer body “Which?” and head of Google You Owe Us, told the Guardian. “Through this action, we will send a strong message to Google and other tech giants in Silicon Valley that we’re not afraid to fight back if our laws are broken.”
Dubbed the “Safari Workaround,” the practice could potentially have breached the U.K.’s Data Protection Act of 1998, which is designed to protect individuals’ personal data stored on computers.
In 2012, it was reported Google (among other companies that rely on advertising) used its failed Google+ platform to confuse a security feature in Safari, giving it the ability to track cookies even when a user didn’t interact with a website. The company reportedly disabled the code after it was contacted by the Wall Street Journal.
“We are taking Google to court for its actions, because we believe that Google owes us trust, fairness and money,” Google You Owe Us wrote on its webpage. “We want to make sure that Google face the consequences for breaching both our trust and the law. If successful, those affected by Google’s actions and who qualify will get the compensation they are owed.”
Google denied the allegations in a statement to the Guardian.
“This is not new,” the company said. “We have defended similar cases before. We don’t believe it has any merit and we will contest it.”
Google You Owe Us explains the claim is subject to the U.K. court’s timetable and that it could take years before it reaches a conclusion.
Phillip Tracy is a former technology staff writer at the Daily Dot. He's an expert on smartphones, social media trends, and gadgets. He previously reported on IoT and telecom for RCR Wireless News and contributed to NewBay Media magazine. He now writes for Laptop magazine.