- ‘Game of Thrones’ meme claims King’s Landing is an ‘inside job’ 5 Years Ago
- Report: Personal data of 49 million Instagram influencers exposed online Today 4:57 PM
- ‘Stranger Things’ season 3 trailer teases a wet, hot American summer Today 4:02 PM
- What Daenerys’ biggest ‘Game of Thrones’ scenes have in common with Nazi propaganda Today 3:12 PM
- Here’s what’s coming to Amazon Prime in June Today 2:11 PM
- Where did Jon Snow go? Unpacking the ‘Game of Thrones’ ending Today 2:04 PM
- So, did anyone actually win ‘Game of Thrones’? Today 1:29 PM
- The surprising religious subtext of ‘John Wick: Chapter 3’ Today 12:53 PM
- Robin Arryn got hot—and the internet is seriously shook Today 12:40 PM
- Tana Mongeau is going to VidCon a year after TanaCon disaster Today 12:12 PM
- What have 2020 Democrats said about Alabama’s abortion ban? Today 11:36 AM
- People keep throwing milkshakes at the U.K.’s far-right politicians Today 11:10 AM
- James Charles is rebounding from his YouTube scandal—and his mentor is paying the price Today 10:42 AM
- Conservatives accuse Pete Buttigieg of wanting to tear down Jefferson Memorial Today 10:28 AM
- Graduating Moorehouse students thank billionaire for vowing to pay off $40m in student debt Today 10:22 AM
Two companies are accusing and sueing Facebook for allegedly scanning private messages for data to sell off.
It turns out your private messages on Facebook aren’t so private after all. And that means more legal trouble for the world’s largest social network.
The company is being sued by a pair of users who allege Facebook scans private messages for links and sells the information to third-party marketing firms and advertisers without consent.
“Contrary to its representations, ‘private’ Facebook messages are systematically intercepted by the company in an effort to learn the contents of the users’ communications,” reads a complaint filed by Matthew Campbell and Michael Hurley this week in the northern California U.S. District Court. “This practice is not done to facilitate the transmission of users’ communications via Facebook, but because it enables Facebook to mine user data and profit from those data by sharing them with third parties—namely, advertisers, marketers, and other data aggregators.”
According to Media Post, the lawsuit stems from 2012 revelations that Facebook scans private messages for links to outside sites that are then used to tabulate the total number of likes for a particular brand or page.
At the time of these initial allegations, Facebook confirmed that their Like counter includes the “number of times people have shared that page’s link on Facebook,” but told the the Wall Street Journal that “absolutely no private information has been exposed.”
But that’s not good enough for the plaintiffs in this case, who allege Facebook has not adequately informed users about these private message scans.
“Facebook misleads users into believing that they have a secure, private mechanism for communication—Facebook’s private messaging function—when, in fact, Facebook intercepts and scans the content and treats portions of that content no differently than a public ‘Like’ or post, broadcast openly across the Internet,” they’re complaint reads.
The plaintiffs, who are seeking class action status, say Facebook violates federal wiretap laws and California privacy laws.
This lawsuit comes hot off the heels of news that Facebook will have to face a lawsuit accusing the social network of misleading investors during its botched initial public stock offering.
Photo by JD Lasica/Flickr
Tim Sampson is a reporter who focused on the technology, business, and politics beats. He's also an established comedy writer, with work on Comedy Central and in The Onion and ClickHole.