- Lizzo called a ‘snitch’ for accusing Postmates runner of stealing food 6 Months Ago
- Government sues Edward Snowden for breaking a non-disclosure agreement 6 Months Ago
- How to stream Tottenham Hotspur vs. Olympiacos in the Champions League Today 1:56 PM
- ‘Love Island’ star’s Instagram photo doctored for MAGA hat ad Today 1:16 PM
- Los Tigres del Norte carry on Johnny Cash’s legacy in stellar Folsom Prison concert film Today 1:05 PM
- Keke Palmer’s ‘sorry to this man’ meme is perfect Today 12:59 PM
- Hoodies with fake bullet holes from prominent school shootings spark outrage Today 12:44 PM
- Instagram apologizes for censoring pictures of fish Today 12:40 PM
- George R.R. Martin clarifies some things about the ‘Game of Thrones’ Targaryen prequel Today 12:20 PM
- Bill Mitchell, the Trump-loving QAnon scammer, is pushing ammunition for a civil war Today 11:53 AM
- How to stream Tigres vs. Cruz Azul in the Leagues Cup final Today 11:48 AM
- How to stream Bayern Munich vs. Belgrade Red Star in Champions League action Today 11:36 AM
- HBO Max gains the streaming rights to ‘The Big Bang Theory’ Today 11:30 AM
- Everyone hates this Russian rapper’s pro-Putin music video Today 10:34 AM
- Skull fire logs are here to make you look like a gleeful murderer Today 10:30 AM
Allegations of Jackson’s sexual misconduct with children have hardly been a secret over the years, dating back to 1993 when he was first accused of sexual abuse by a 13-year-old boy. Although criminal charges were never filed in 1993—and Jackson was likewise acquitted in the 2005 case, People v. Jackson—the documentary has brought renewed interest into the subject. And hearing the firsthand accounts of alleged victims Wade Robson and James Safechuck have now made it difficult to continue to turn a blind eye to Jackson’s behavior.
Fans are understandably having a difficult time reckoning with this new information, and grappling whether or not it’s still OK to enjoy the music from a man who may have been a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Of course, whether or not one chooses to believe the testimony of Robson and Safechuck may color an individual’s feelings on the issue—but it’s probably safe to say that Streisand, of all people, has come up with the absolute worst take on the whole thing.
In a recent interview with the Evening Standard, Streisand confessed that she “absolutely” believes that both men were telling the truth about their experiences with Jackson, but like, it was probably fine.
“His sexual needs were his sexual needs, coming from whatever childhood he has or whatever DNA he has,” she said. “You can say ‘molested,’ but those children, as you heard say [the grown-up Robson and Safechuck], they were thrilled to be there. They both married and they both have children, so it didn’t kill them.”
The 76-year-old singer-songwriter went on to say that she has “a combination of feelings” about what transpired and places the bulk of the blame on the parents of the alleged victims.
“I feel bad for the children. I feel bad for him,” she said. “I blame, I guess, the parents, who would allow their children to sleep with him.”
While the parents definitely do shoulder some of the blame, so does the literal (alleged) child molester, so Streisand’s remarks are going over about as well as you’d imagine. Leaving Neverland director Dan Reed was one of the first to call out Streisand, tweeting out what’s in all of our heads right now: “Did you really say that?”
Others also jumped into the fray to express similar sentiments. There are also jokes: Twitter mobs come down hard and fast, and at least this one is self-aware.
“It is with the heaviest of hearts that I cancel Barbra Streisand,” writer Alan Henry tweeted.
It is with the heaviest of hearts that I cancel Barbra Streisand. https://t.co/h5mmHhKZN4— Alan Henry (@AlanHenry) March 23, 2019
Chaos at Gay HQ As Barbra Streisand's Status Downgraded from Yas Queen to Bye Felicia— Eric D. Snider (@EricDSnider) March 23, 2019
"Nuts" is a deeply underrated Barbra Streisand film nobody seems to remember; about how childhood sexual abuse can damage an adult for decades.— John Fugelsang (@JohnFugelsang) March 23, 2019
And you seriously wouldn’t believe who’s forgotten it.
Is this that “bad side” Barbara Streisand is afraid to be photographed from https://t.co/2N29PdJOzU— Chase Mitchell (@ChaseMit) March 23, 2019
Congrats to all those who bet that the person to be cancelled on #MuellerDay would be Barbra Streisand.— Devin Cow Thoughtleader (@ProfJeffJarviss) March 23, 2019
Congratulations to Barbra Streisand on becoming Twitter's new main character!https://t.co/Ru90UzidJa— Mark Harris (@MarkHarrisNYC) March 23, 2019
Others are pointing out that Streisand is a well-known eccentric. She’s cloned her dog and had a private shopping mall built in her house.
barbara streisand had an enormous private upscale mall built in the basement of her house so she could “go shopping” without having to be around normal people. shocked to learn she’s a weirdo— chair admirer (@KrangTNelson) March 23, 2019
If Barbra Streisand thinks this will make me forget she cloned her dog TWICE, she is sorely mistaken— Brian Grubb (@briancgrubb) March 23, 2019
Just try to imagine the reality Barbara Streisand lives in. There is no way that shit bears even a *passing* resemblance to the world you and I occupy— Scott Wampler™ (@ScottWamplerBMD) March 23, 2019
Streisand has yet to comment on the dumpster fire her comments ignited, but we should probably expect a formal apology at any moment, now.
Stacey Ritzen is a reporter and editor based in West Philadelphia with over 10 years' experience covering pop culture, web culture, entertainment, and news. You can follow her on Twitter @staceyritzen.