The ‘Kardashian index’ measures researchers’ social clout

The “Kardashian Index” measures a scientist’s citations against his or her Twitter followers. 

 

Shadan Larki

Internet Culture

Published Aug 5, 2014   Updated May 30, 2021, 7:59 pm CDT

Kim Kardashian’s celebrity status has inspired University of Liverpool geneticist Neil Hall to create the “Kardashian Index,” which measures a scientist’s citations against his or her Twitter followers. 

Featured Video Hide

“Consider Kim Kardashian; she comes from a privileged background and, despite having not achieved anything consequential in science, politics or the arts … she is one of the most followed people on Twitter and [one of] the most searched-for [people] on Google,” Hall wrote in his full report. “I am concerned that phenomena similar to that of Kim Kardashian may also exist in the scientific community.”

Advertisement Hide

Enter Hall’s solution, the “Kardashian Index.” It’s “a measure of discrepancy between a scientist’s social media profile and publication record based on the direct comparison of numbers of citations and Twitter followers.”

The K-Index can be calculated by dividing one’s total Twitter followers by the number of scientific citations. Hall purposes that scientists include their K-index in their Twitter profiles, and that “those people whose K-index is greater than 5 can be considered ‘Science Kardashians.’” 

Hall notes that while historically women have been ignored by the scientific community, most “science Kardashians” are, in fact, men. 

Hall’s own index was marginally above 1 when he wrote the study, although he suggests ”A few tweets linking me with the word ‘Kardashian’ should put my K-index through the roof.” 

No word yet if Hall’s index has climbed, but his satirical look at popularity has brought @neilhall_uk plenty of buzz. 

Advertisement Hide

Reporters at my house asking about my K index – I am more than my K index http://t.co/1c7LosXpP2 cc: @neilhall_uk pic.twitter.com/fpR01SXVgH

— Jonathan Eisen (@phylogenomics) July 30, 2014

My K-index is about 0.6, not bad balance rly RT @GenomeBiology: @neilhall_uk writes abt scientific Kardashian index http://t.co/GFWQ3CcnUF

— Jason McDermott (@BioDataGanache) July 29, 2014

Don’t worry @neilhall_uk, “The only thing worse than being talked about, is not being talked about.” -Oscar Wilde …loved the #K_index

— Joe Russell (@waywardsyintist) July 30, 2014

Advertisement Hide

Scientists on Twitter. My take on the Kardashian index. http://t.co/a29Rzggzrp #science #neuroscience @neilhall_uk

— J.-François Gariépy (@JFGariepy) July 31, 2014

Wow, I spawned a hashtag, I should retire … It’s all downhill from here #AlternateScienceMetrics

— Neil Hall (@neilhall_uk) July 30, 2014

Advertisement Hide

H/T The Verge | Photo via Wikimedia Commons

Share this article
*First Published: Aug 5, 2014, 4:43 pm CDT