- Slack’s users roast the app’s new logo 5 Years Ago
- What I’ve learned after 100 hours on Sling TV 5 Years Ago
- Korean action thriller ‘Revenger’ fights its way through mediocrity 5 Years Ago
- Everything you need to know about the Women’s March 2019 controversies Today 6:30 AM
- Everyone is choking Sasuke Uchiha in this ‘Naruto’ anime meme Today 6:30 AM
- Right-wing petition wants Rashida Tlaib impeached—here’s why that won’t happen Today 6:30 AM
- How to watch ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ season 2 for free Today 6:00 AM
- How to watch ‘Supernatural’ online for free Today 5:30 AM
- How to watch ‘Million Dollar Listing Los Angeles’ online free Today 5:00 AM
- The trailer for the final episodes of ‘Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt’ is here Today 1:52 AM
- Guy gets roasted for throwing razor in the toilet to protest Gillette Wednesday 9:23 PM
- Experts warn of uptick in ‘Ryuk’ ransomware after hackers net $3.7 million Wednesday 7:03 PM
- Video game composer boycotts Gillette after anti-toxic masculinity ad Wednesday 6:05 PM
- Steve Carell sitcom ‘Space Force’ heading to Netflix Wednesday 5:30 PM
- Ocasio-Cortez’s ‘run train’ phrase becomes conservative sex controversy Wednesday 5:25 PM
DC’s New 52 lineup was supposed to revitalize the troubled comics publisher. Instead, it’s canceled almost as many titles.
In the annals of geek culture, the Marvel vs DC debate looms large, and while Marvel has undoubtedly been winning the PR war lately, for a moment back in 2011, DC seemed poised to make a mighty comeback with its launch of the New 52.
Featuring a wide range of all-new titles as well as major relaunches, the New 52 was, in theory, supposed to consist of 52 new titles that would revitalize the company and invigorate DC’s fanbase. Instead, as DC mangled storylines and dropped titles right and left, the “52” ballooned and changed, and customer dissatisfaction grew over the way DC handled cancellations and dropped storylines.
Now, as Comics Alliance’s Andrew Wheeler points out, the publisher stands dangerously close to having canceled 52 titles in its New 52 collection. Wheeler notes that since the lineup began, DC has averaged one final issue almost every three weeks.
One of the main problems with DC’s new attempt to galvanize its readership is that its readership has evolved. Comics fandom is becoming larger and more diverse all the time, and DC doesn’t seem able or willing to expand the diversity of its own lineup accordingly. Where Marvel has shown a willingness to listen to its fans regarding everything from increasing diversity to giving female superheroes real costumes and their own TV series, DC has seemed consistently out of step with the times.
In the past few months alone it’s alienated readers by issuing blatantly tone deaf covers that objectify women, punctuating Black History month by whitewashing a few of its characters from pre-New 52 titles, and, of course, refusing to give fans a Wonder Woman movie.
Another factor is that DC seems indifferent to how storylines in its New 52 series are concluded, delaying titles, abruptly canceling series, and in some cases even releasing them out of order despite how confusing this must be to readers.
Wheeler points out that DC has been trying to give progressive titles a chance, stories like Birds of Prey and Batwing, its last solo title led by a character of color. But the former title suffered from being separated from its original writer and lead character, Gail Simone and Barbara Gordon, while the second title never managed to find its audience. Wheeler speculates that this is because of DC’s “monolithic” style and the kinds of storytelling that make it difficult to engage new readers.
Its low number of women writers and publisher Dan Didio’s infamous “who should we be hiring?” defense at the 2011 Comic Con probably didn’t help either—though DC has since increased the number of women writers on staff from one to four for its upcoming batch of releases.
But it’s also worth noting that DC, particularly with its groundbreaking ’80s masterworks like Swamp Thing, Dark Knight Returns, and its entire Vertigo imprint, has an esteemed and important history of embracing comics that are dark, full of social commentary, and narratively risky, while pinning its success on its two most famous icons, Batman and Superman. It’s a strategy that led to DC taking the prize for 6 of the top 10 bestselling comic issues in the first decade of the millennium.
But the new mass of mainstream audiences are eager for excitement, action, and talking raccoons. In its haste to incorporate this new readership, DC seems to be warring with the eternal question of how to engage new readers with new titles while still staying true to its core fanbase, and the spirit that makes DC unique.
Given the constant and dizzying rotation of dropped and new titles, DC seems to be throwing things at audiences to see what sticks. Currently, the only thing that seems clear is that audiences want more Batman and more Justice League. But New 52’s Batfamily is one without Cassandra Cain, the first member of color, and the current Justice League has a Wonder Woman that’s a glorified extra. Meanwhile, other progressive titles like Blue Beetle got the axe long ago.
And, of course, there’s the simple factor that fans who invested in early New 52 titles only to see them unceremoniously dropped will be wary of picking up new titles for fear those titles, too, might suffer the same fate.
In August, the New 52 line will be three years old. But unless it can figure out a way to diversify and bring new fans on board without mowing down its lineup, the Marvel fandom’s “on your left, DC” meme will continue to work against it.
Hopefully, DC can get its act together before it celebrates the New 52 anniversary by canceling New 52 altogether.
Photo via Wikimedia Commons
Aja Romano is a geek culture reporter and fandom expert. Their reporting at the Daily Dot covered everything from Harry Potter and anime to Tumblr and Gamergate. Romano joined Vox as a staff reporter in 2016.