- The actor who played Greedo is just as confused by ‘maclunkey’ as you are Friday 4:57 PM
- AirPods are getting that sweet, sweet Black Friday price drop Friday 4:24 PM
- Looking for a Nintendo Switch? Black Friday deals are here Friday 4:04 PM
- Facebook copies Instagram with experimental ‘Popular Photos’ feature Friday 3:58 PM
- This iPhone app says it will alert you if you’ve been hacked Friday 2:43 PM
- ‘Marvel’s Hero Project’ is the wholesome content 2019 needs Friday 2:40 PM
- Get more out of VSCO with VSCO search Friday 2:09 PM
- Twitter carves out ‘cause-based’ advocacy exemption in political ads ban Friday 2:06 PM
- Disney+ accounts are being hacked—here’s how to protect yourself Friday 1:52 PM
- Instagram is hiding likes globally and searching for a ‘well-being’ product researcher Friday 1:42 PM
- ‘The Mandalorian’ opens up its mythology even further in ‘Chapter 2’ Friday 12:54 PM
- Want to buy a drone on a budget? We’ve got you covered Friday 12:51 PM
- ‘Simpsons’ writer accuses Republicans of stealing Sideshow Bob’s defense Friday 12:49 PM
- Keanu Reeves’ appearance in ‘SpongeBob Movie’ trailer quickly becomes a meme Friday 12:35 PM
- Charli XCX makes the band in Netflix’s ‘Nasty Cherry’ Friday 12:33 PM
The FBI calls PRISM “the 702 tool,” claims it caught subway bomber
“Without the 702 tool, we would not have identified Najibullah Zazi.”
The FBI claimed Tuesday that only through PRISM has it been able to stop select terrorist attacks.
Which is noteworthy, because the government doesn’t like to use the word “PRISM” in public.
PRISM, still only somewhat understood, was revealed by whistleblower-on-the-run Edward Snowden as the secret tool the NSA uses to track Internet communications. It’s no secret that government officials, including President Obama, the FBI, the NSA, and members of Congress, have defended PRISM as both legal and useful for finding terrorists before they strike. But those groups have resolutely refused to call the program by that name.
Instead, they’re referring to it as “the 702 tool,” a nod to the section of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) that makes it legal. That’s left a few questions dangling: Is PRISM just one of many secret programs? Is the government actually talking about PRISM at all when it talks about section 702?
In an open House Intelligence Committee hearing Tuesday (they’re almost always closed), NSA director General Keith Alexander said of his agencies’ programs, and in conjunction with the FBI, that:
[I]n recent years, these programs, together with other intelligence, have protected the U.S. and our allies from terrorist threats across the globe…to include helping prevent the terrorist events over 50 times since 9/11
But that’s not the same as saying PRISM specifically led to saving the U.S. from attacks. Alexander said that his agency might raise that number past 50 as it reevaluates some cases, but only ten of those thwarted attacks were on U.S. soil. And more importantly, considering the widespread public outrage against PRISM, that doesn’t necessarily mean the NSA needed that program to do its job.
It was only after the hearing had dragged on for more than an hour that Rep. Mike Thompson (D-Calif.) said the P-word and got a straight answer from an intelligence official. Asking about remarks President Obama had made in an interview the night before about Najibullah Zazi, who in 2009 attempted to bomb the New York City subway system, Thompson said:
“The president suggested in his television interview that the New York subway bomber would not have been caught without PRISM.”
In response, Sean Joyce, Deputy Director of the FBI, finally used “702” interchangably with PRISM.
“Yes, that is accurate,” Joyce answered. “Without the 702 tool, we would not have identified Najibullah Zazi.”
That doesn’t mean, of course, that PRISM is the only program that the NSA and FBI have developed under section 702. But at least we finally know it’s one of them.
Photo of Joyce via Wikimedia Commons
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.