- ‘Weathering With You’ blends fantasy and realism in a magical love story Saturday 6:18 PM
- Kidnapped teen used Snapchat to get rescued Saturday 4:35 PM
- What fans do and don’t want to see in future ‘Far Cry’ installments Saturday 4:26 PM
- Aaron Carter accused of stealing lion art for merch Saturday 3:10 PM
- Instagram’s hidden like counts were inspired by a ‘Black Mirror’ episode Saturday 2:06 PM
- Student says they were expelled for tricking teacher into making inappropriate TikTok Saturday 12:26 PM
- Space Force uniforms relentlessly mocked, memed Saturday 10:52 AM
- Man flamed after admitting he called police on Target employee over a toothbrush Saturday 9:10 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Vivir Dos Veces’ searches for a last chance at first love Saturday 8:00 AM
- Camila Cabello must do more about her racist history Saturday 6:00 AM
- Instagram and Facebook are reportedly blocking queer ads Friday 8:58 PM
- Review: Tyler Perry’s ‘A Fall From Grace’ is both nonsensical and utterly predictable Friday 6:48 PM
- Is Hulu censoring the Iran episode of Anthony Bourdain’s ‘Parts Unknown’? Friday 6:05 PM
- Trump admin celebrates Michelle Obama’s birthday by proposing rollback of her signature initiative Friday 4:01 PM
- TSA apologizes after agent grabs indigenous woman’s braids, says ‘giddyup’ Friday 3:28 PM
U.S. says ‘outside party’ can crack terrorist’s iPhone, asks to cancel Apple–FBI hearing
‘If the method is viable, it should eliminate the need for the assistance from Apple Inc.’
In a motion filed on Monday, the DOJ said an “outside party” may be able to help the Federal Bureau of Investigation access the locked iPhone 5c used by San Bernardino shooter Syed Rizwan Farook. If the newly announced alternative method works, the FBI would not need Apple’s assistance.
A magistrate judge in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California last month ordered Apple to write custom software that would allow federal agents to flood Farook’s phone with passwords without risk of triggering a self-destruct security feature. Apple does not have access to the data due to full-disk encryption first enabled by default in iOS 8. Farook’s iPhone runs a version of iOS 9.
Apple vowed to fight the order, arguing that creating the software would put all its users at risk by creating a so-called “backdoor” in the company’s encryption. It also argued that the statute on which the order was based, the All Writs Act, could not be used to force a private company to compromise its own products. The legal battle set off a firestorm of debate over digital security versus national security and charges from Apple and its supporters that the FBI was attempting to set a dangerous precedent.
The FBI is testing whether the new method, demonstrated by an unnamed third party on Sunday, is “viable.”
“On Sunday, March 20, 2016, an outside party demonstrated to the FBI a possible method for unlocking Farook’s iPhone,” U.S. prosecutors wrote in the filing. “Testing is required to determine whether it is a viable method that will not compromise data on Farook’s iPhone. If the method is viable, it should eliminate the need for the assistance from Apple Inc. (‘Apple’) set forth in the All Writs Act Order in this case.”
The FBI originally believed Apple alone could access Farook’s locked iPhone due to its tight security features. By having Apple write custom software, the company could sign the code with its unique signature to allow it to work on the device. It is unclear what other method the FBI may pursue, though some believe it may be possible to access the phone’s data with enough money, skill, and the right tools.
The current Apple–FBI debate is part of a decades-long battle over encryption. FBI Director James Comey reignited the so-called “crypto wars” nearly a year ago when he argued that default encryption enabled in Apple and Google’s mobile operating system was aiding criminals and terrorists by making their communications inaccessible to law enforcement, a consequence Comey calls “going dark.”
The DOJ has requested Judge Sheri Pym, the federal magistrate judge for the district court in Riverside, California, that was set to hear the case on Tuesday, accept a progress report from the federal government by April 5 in lieu of tomorrow’s hearing.
Update 5:32pm CT, March 21: American Civil Liberties Union attorney Alex Abdo provided the following statement to the Daily Dot: “This suggests that the FBI either doesn’t understand the technology well enough or wasn’t telling us the full truth earlier when it said that only Apple could break into the phone. Either possibility is disconcerting.”
Update 9:07pm CT, March 21: Added additional contextual information.
Update 10:02pm CT, March 21: Judge Sheri Pym granted the DOJ’s request to postpone the hearing.
Additional reporting by William Turton
Photo via Janitors/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
Andrew Couts is the former editor of Layer 8, a section dedicated to the intersection of the Internet and the state—and the gaps in between. Prior to the Daily Dot, Couts served as features editor and features writer for Digital Trends, associate editor of TheWeek.com, and associate editor at Maxim magazine. When he’s not working, Couts can be found hiking with his German shepherds or blasting around on motorcycles.