- Fortnite streamer Tfue sues gaming organization FaZe Clan over contract dispute Today 12:28 AM
- Report finds some users can’t opt out of Facebook’s face recognition Monday 7:27 PM
- Get emotional over this real-life pastor baptizing an anime girl in virtual reality Monday 6:53 PM
- Twitter wants to know what Jack in the Box did to offend Kim Kardashian Monday 6:38 PM
- ‘Game of Thrones’ meme claims King’s Landing is an ‘inside job’ Monday 6:06 PM
- Report: Personal data of 49 million Instagram influencers exposed online Monday 4:57 PM
- ‘Stranger Things’ season 3 trailer teases a wet, hot American summer Monday 4:02 PM
- What Daenerys’ biggest ‘Game of Thrones’ scenes have in common with Nazi propaganda Monday 3:12 PM
- Here’s what’s coming to Amazon Prime in June Monday 2:11 PM
- Where did Jon Snow go? Unpacking the ‘Game of Thrones’ ending Monday 2:04 PM
- So, did anyone actually win ‘Game of Thrones’? Monday 1:29 PM
- The surprising religious subtext of ‘John Wick: Chapter 3’ Monday 12:53 PM
- Robin Arryn got hot—and the internet is seriously shook Monday 12:40 PM
- Tana Mongeau is going to VidCon a year after TanaCon disaster Monday 12:12 PM
- What have 2020 Democrats said about Alabama’s abortion ban? Monday 11:36 AM
The government doesn’t disclose who it tries with NSA surveillance evidence. The ACLU is suing to find out.
Since 2008, the Department of Justice (DoJ) has been authorized to wiretap, without a warrant, American citizens communicating with a party outside the U.S. However, it has never disclosed any instance in which it has used that information in court.
The American Civil Liberties Union is looking to change that.
As reported by Wired, on Thursday, the ACLU filed suit against the DoJ, demanding to know the names of those prosecuted with evidence obtained through warrantless wiretapping, which is permitted under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
As Wired points out, federal law requires that those accused of crimes be informed of how evidence against them was collected (in part because, if that collection method is illegal, the evidence will be thrown out).
The ACLU suit comes six months after the organization filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking “the case name, docket number, and court of all legal proceedings, including criminal prosecutions, current or past, in which the Department of Justice intends or intended to enter into evidence, or otherwise used or disclosed in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding, any information obtained or derived from electronic surveillance pursuant to the authority of the FAA.”
Apparently, the DoJ has not complied with the request. According to the current ACLU suit, “no component has released any responsive record or explained why responsive records are being withheld.”
The suit presents something of a predicament for the DOJ. On the one hand, it would appear it is required to disclose this information to defendants. However, doing so would no doubt compromise the National Security Agency’s ability to collect the information in secret.
Of course, since former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden disclosed a drove of documents detailing the NSA’s collection methods, it has become clear public opinion on the validity of keeping these collection tools secret is mixed.
As the ACLU argued in its suit, the NSA is a “surveillance authority whose wisdom, effectiveness, and legality is a matter of intense and ongoing public debate.“
Photo by Tim Green/Flickr
Joe Kloc is a former Daily Dot contributor who covered technology and policy. He's contributed to Newsweek and Mother Jones, discussed his reporting on air with WNYC, and written Weekly Reviews for Harper's Magazine.