- iPhone overloaded? Here’s how to cancel app subscriptions Monday 11:02 PM
- Fan-created ‘app’ lets users experience the final moments of the ill-fated Jeremy Renner app Monday 10:00 PM
- Milo Yiannopoulos receives lifetime ban from furry convention Monday 7:49 PM
- Snapchat just made all political ads purchased publicly available Monday 6:12 PM
- How to stream Barcelona vs. Borussia Dortmund in Champions League action Monday 5:39 PM
- How to stream Liverpool vs. Napoli in Champions League action Monday 5:19 PM
- How to make real money with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk Monday 5:03 PM
- How to stream Chelsea vs. Valencia in the Champions League group stage Monday 4:47 PM
- ‘SNL’ fires Shane Gillis for racist, homophobic comments Monday 4:41 PM
- Ben Shapiro wants accusers to describe Brett Kavanaugh’s penis Monday 4:30 PM
- Twitch suspends streamer for wearing Chun-Li cosplay Monday 4:11 PM
- Report: 8 years of Trump tax returns subpoenaed by prosecutors Monday 3:45 PM
- Netflix lands exclusive streaming rights to ‘Seinfeld’ Monday 3:34 PM
- Jenny Slate sets first comedy special at Netflix Monday 3:05 PM
- #EndSmearFear is aiming to save lives Monday 2:54 PM
Even though gay marriage is law of the land, Texas legislators have introduced a bill that would excuse judges and other elected officials from issuing marriage licenses to gay couples for religious reasons.
The bill, which was introduced on Tuesday, has already seen preliminary approval in the Senate by a vote of 21-10. Republicans unanimously supported the measure, and if the bill passes a Wednesday vote, it will be sent over to the House.
The response may seem abrupt and out-of-place, but Texas’s Legislature meets once every two years: meaning that this is the first opportunity for the legislative body to fire back at the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling making gay marriage legal throughout the nation.
“If we don’t do this, we are discriminating against people of faith,” Sen. Brian Birdwell (R), the bill’s sponsor, said according to U.S. News.
The bill is a complicated one, too. Instead of granting a marriage certificate, a judge or official objecting to a same-sex marriage under religious freedom will step aside so that an official who does not object can issue the marriage certificate. The process theoretically still allows gay couples to marry, albeit under strain and embarrassment.
North Carolina also introduced a bill yesterday to ban gay marriage ceremonies and prohibit the state from recognizing same-sex marriages.
But why are these states challenging a Supreme Court ruling outlawing gay marriage bans? Republicans may feel emboldened by President Donald Trump’s new Supreme Court justice, Neil Gorsuch. Previously, Gorsuch argued in favor of Hobby Lobby in the Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius ruling, defending religious objections for denying contraceptives to employees. Gorsuch may be open to other “religious freedom” rulings, prompting state Republicans to push the limits of Hobby Lobby under religious objections.
But it seems unlikely that the Texas bill will stay law for long if it passes at all. There’s already a legal precedent against religious freedom laws being struck down if they target gay marriage.
“The Texas Senate today said it has no problem with public officials picking and choosing which taxpayers they will serve,” Texas Freedom Network president Kathy Miller said, U.S. News reports. “This bill opens the door to taxpayer-funded discrimination against virtually anyone who doesn’t meet a public official’s personal moral standards.”
H/T U.S. News
Ana Valens is a reporter specializing in online queer communities, marginalized identities, and adult content creation. She is Daily Dot's Trans/Sex columnist. Her work has appeared at Vice, Vox, Truthout, Bitch Media, Kill Screen, Rolling Stone, and the Toast. She lives in Brooklyn, New York, and spends her free time developing queer adult games.