- Black server says manager refused to discipline coworkers who sent racist receipt 3 Years Ago
- Who is Jonah Hauer-King, Disney’s new Prince Eric? 3 Years Ago
- Cut Katherine Langford ‘Avengers: Endgame’ scene lands on Disney+ 3 Years Ago
- Planned Parenthood app to show abortion-seeking users their nearest options 3 Years Ago
- ‘The Imagineering Story’ offers touching insight into Walt Disney’s vision 3 Years Ago
- YouTube mom who was charged with child abuse dead at 48 Today 11:39 AM
- Every Marvel Cinematic Universe movie and show missing from Disney+ (and when they’ll show up) Today 11:35 AM
- HBO Max is planning a ‘Friends’ reunion special Today 11:10 AM
- 18 games you’ll want to have for all your holiday parties Today 11:09 AM
- Why the internet is obsessed with the Home Depot song Today 11:04 AM
- What are the ‘nude pictures’ of Trump Devin Nunes keeps bringing up? Today 10:40 AM
- How to watch tonight’s fire Clippers vs. Rockets matchup online Today 9:27 AM
- Ilhan Omar says Stephen Miller emails prove he’s a ‘white nationalist Today 9:00 AM
- YouTubers Trisha Paytas and Gabbie Hanna are feuding—and it’s gotten nasty Today 8:40 AM
- Can buttoned-up Elizabeth Warren memes bring order to a chaotic 2020 election? Today 8:17 AM
Even though gay marriage is law of the land, Texas legislators have introduced a bill that would excuse judges and other elected officials from issuing marriage licenses to gay couples for religious reasons.
The bill, which was introduced on Tuesday, has already seen preliminary approval in the Senate by a vote of 21-10. Republicans unanimously supported the measure, and if the bill passes a Wednesday vote, it will be sent over to the House.
The response may seem abrupt and out-of-place, but Texas’s Legislature meets once every two years: meaning that this is the first opportunity for the legislative body to fire back at the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling making gay marriage legal throughout the nation.
“If we don’t do this, we are discriminating against people of faith,” Sen. Brian Birdwell (R), the bill’s sponsor, said according to U.S. News.
The bill is a complicated one, too. Instead of granting a marriage certificate, a judge or official objecting to a same-sex marriage under religious freedom will step aside so that an official who does not object can issue the marriage certificate. The process theoretically still allows gay couples to marry, albeit under strain and embarrassment.
North Carolina also introduced a bill yesterday to ban gay marriage ceremonies and prohibit the state from recognizing same-sex marriages.
But why are these states challenging a Supreme Court ruling outlawing gay marriage bans? Republicans may feel emboldened by President Donald Trump’s new Supreme Court justice, Neil Gorsuch. Previously, Gorsuch argued in favor of Hobby Lobby in the Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius ruling, defending religious objections for denying contraceptives to employees. Gorsuch may be open to other “religious freedom” rulings, prompting state Republicans to push the limits of Hobby Lobby under religious objections.
But it seems unlikely that the Texas bill will stay law for long if it passes at all. There’s already a legal precedent against religious freedom laws being struck down if they target gay marriage.
“The Texas Senate today said it has no problem with public officials picking and choosing which taxpayers they will serve,” Texas Freedom Network president Kathy Miller said, U.S. News reports. “This bill opens the door to taxpayer-funded discrimination against virtually anyone who doesn’t meet a public official’s personal moral standards.”
H/T U.S. News
Ana Valens is a reporter specializing in online queer communities, marginalized identities, and adult content creation. She is Daily Dot's Trans/Sex columnist. Her work has appeared at Vice, Vox, Truthout, Bitch Media, Kill Screen, Rolling Stone, and the Toast. She lives in Brooklyn, New York, and spends her free time developing queer adult games.