- Congress asks Ring for more information about police partnerships 3 Years Ago
- Vlogger who posts behind-the-scenes footage at Disney is in trouble with YouTube 3 Years Ago
- Was Bloomberg owned harder on the debate stage or by Twitter? Today 8:54 AM
- Make ‘Animal Crossing: New Horizons’ your desert island game Today 8:51 AM
- Everyone’s trying to dance like Jennifer Lopez on TikTok Today 8:27 AM
- Why the coronavirus bioweapon theory persists Today 7:57 AM
- You won’t see deleted scenes on the ‘Rise of Skywalker’ home release Today 7:47 AM
- The return of ‘Star Wars: The Clone Wars’ throws you right back into the fight Today 7:00 AM
- Am I overreacting to a Facebook message from a dating app match? Today 6:00 AM
- Buttigieg, Klobuchar come together to laugh at Bloomberg Wednesday 10:29 PM
- Bernie Sanders calls Bloomberg’s wealth ‘grotesque’ to his face Wednesday 9:53 PM
- Angry Bloomberg asks debate moderators if he’s ‘chicken liver’ Wednesday 9:29 PM
- Elizabeth Warren savages everyone else’s healthcare plan Wednesday 9:07 PM
- K-Pop stans help push ‘Pooping for Kaitlin’ hashtag mocking Kent State gun girl Wednesday 8:54 PM
- Fans speculate after learning Pop Smoke posted address prior to fatal home invasion Wednesday 8:11 PM
When signing the $1.1 trillion spending bill that will keep the government running for now, President Donald Trump confused many on Friday with a signing statement in which he apparently wonders whether helping finance historically black colleges is constitutional.
As Politico writes, Trump pointed to the Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Program and said it allocates “benefits on the basis of race, ethnicity, and gender.” Trump said those programs would be treated by his administration “in a manner consistent with the requirement to afford equal protection of the law under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment.”
That statement confused Cheryl Smith, a vice president at the United Negro College Fund who said in a statement that the organization is “puzzled by this provision and seeking clarification from the White House as to its meaning.”
Derek W. Black, a law professor at the University of South Carolina, told Politico it was an odd statement to make. “If Congress is validly spending money on these programs, and there’s no court finding or litigation suggesting discrimination, the idea that the executive would unilaterally not allocate those funds would be a rather momentous position to take,” Black said. “…. Why stop here? If you’re worried about the allocation of benefits in unfair ways, why not add other things like religion or disability?”
The Historically Black College and University Capital Financing Program was created by Congress in 1992, and it helps finance construction for new buildings on HBCU campuses.
Josh Katzowitz is a staff writer at the Daily Dot specializing in YouTube and boxing. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times. A longtime sports writer, he's covered the NFL for CBSSports.com and boxing for Forbes. His work has been noted twice in the Best American Sports Writing book series.