- ‘Ghosts of Sugar Land’ explores what happens if your friend joins ISIS 2 Years Ago
- Andrew Yang upset porn fans with his criticism of Bing Tuesday 10:34 PM
- Kamala Harris really wants Trump kicked off Twitter Tuesday 10:22 PM
- Bernie Sanders jokes he didn’t use medical marijuana before tonight’s debate Tuesday 9:47 PM
- Tulsi Gabbard says she’s not a Russian asset—which is just what a Russian asset would say Tuesday 9:20 PM
- Warren says she doesn’t have a ‘beef with billionaires’ Tuesday 8:59 PM
- Andrew Yang’s Universal Basic Income plan gets support from other candidates Tuesday 8:40 PM
- Christmas creep is real, and it’s all over Tom Steyer’s neck Tuesday 8:05 PM
- Stans are using pictures of Beyoncé to catfish sugar daddies Tuesday 7:18 PM
- Wait, who the heck is Tom Steyer? Tuesday 7:17 PM
- Teacher caught on video in racist rant put on leave without pay Tuesday 5:44 PM
- Pornhub pulls Girls Do Porn videos amid sex trafficking charges Tuesday 4:49 PM
- Gina Rodriguez sings N-word on Instagram story Tuesday 4:41 PM
- Trump Jr. mocked for Hunter Biden tweet about profiting from dad’s name Tuesday 3:58 PM
- All the holiday movies and shows coming to Netflix in 2019 Tuesday 3:48 PM
Facebook’s friendliness with third-parties accessing user data isn’t a recent trend. In the social network’s earlier days, it gave a little-known search engine called Profile Engine access to its backend—and troves of user data.
Founded in 2007, Profile Engine is a search engine designed around finding people on social networks. While roughly 10 million people created their own profiles on the site, the majority of Profile Engine’s information came from scraping other social networks, namely Facebook. While the website isn’t particularly popular, it came to prominence around 2014 after Europe’s “right to be forgotten” law came into effect. Many individuals requested their information be removed from the site.
According to a Profile Engine help page explaining how the site got all of its data, here’s how it happened:
Facebook made available about 420 million public profiles and contracted with us to provide a powerful search engine for Facebook (originally simply called “Advanced Search for Facebook” and later renamed “The Profile Engine”). We added these profiles from Facebook to the profile engine database with the full knowledge, approval and permission of Facebook. Facebook agreed to this because we provided them with powerful and innovative search engine features which are not available on Facebook itself.
Profile Engine goes on to say that these same profiles were offered to other search engines, market research organizations, and made the data publicly downloadable as bittorent files, too. As opposed to the data shared with Cambridge Analytica, however, all of this data was public at the time. The search engine had access to this data from 2007 to 2010, when Facebook suddenly quit maintaining the information and didn’t communicate when information was deleted or made private.
Before that point, the search engine gathered 15 billion “friendship” connections between people, three billion “likes,” and information about group memberships.
In 2012, Profile Engine sued Facebook over the change of heart. While it no longer gets updated information directly from Facebook, the site still exists today, and you can still search it for user profiles.
This week, Facebook overhauled and simplified its privacy settings menu in an attempt to pacify users following the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The social network has also disabled the practice of allowing third-party data for ad-targeting. The moves are positive but don’t negate questionable practices from Facebook’s past.
Christina Bonnington is a tech reporter who specializes in consumer gadgets, apps, and the trends shaping the technology industry. Her work has also appeared in Gizmodo, Wired, Refinery29, Slate, Bicycling, and Outside Magazine. She is based in the San Francisco Bay Area and has a background in electrical engineering.