- Daniel Caesar dons cape for whiteness—and gets canceled Wednesday 4:29 PM
- Triton is a new malware ‘deliberately’ designed to put lives at risk Wednesday 3:23 PM
- ‘Into the Dark: I’m Just F*cking with You’ is one of the series’ best Wednesday 1:54 PM
- Trump’s latest prop, a map of ISIS, gets memed Wednesday 12:54 PM
- HBO sends fans on a global scavenger hunt for 6 Iron Thrones Wednesday 11:51 AM
- The Awkward Family Photos game is Cards Against Humanity for meme lovers Wednesday 11:50 AM
- London firefighters’ organization accuses ‘Peppa Pig’ of sexism Wednesday 11:41 AM
- YouTuber accused of abusing her children to make kid-friendly content Wednesday 11:20 AM
- Ari Fleischer’s Iraq War tweet isn’t going over well Wednesday 10:54 AM
- Cop arrested for recording man’s genitals, forcing mentally ill man to twerk Wednesday 10:37 AM
- MoviePass rebrands its unlimited plan, again Wednesday 10:37 AM
- Former Alaska senator launches meme-filled 2020 primary campaign Wednesday 10:17 AM
- The Shane Dawson cat controversy has resulted in these sex memes Wednesday 10:06 AM
- Sarah Sanders mocks CNN reporter with ‘dear diary’ tweet Wednesday 9:03 AM
- Know what you’re signing up for thanks to these dating site reviews Wednesday 8:58 AM
The Boy Scouts finally lifted its ban on gay leaders—but there’s still one huge problem
This isn’t the win we wanted.
The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) has finally lifted its ban on gay adults—except for those groups that still want to discriminate. The response on Twitter to the long overdue decision was exuberant—if cautious.
Just a reminder that the Boy Scouts of America will still kick you out if you’re openly atheist. But glad to see the ban on gay leaders end.
— Hemant Mehta (@hemantmehta) July 27, 2015
It’s cause for optimism that the BSA is not enforcing the ban on every chapter and group. But by allowing some to discriminate by choice—at this particular juncture in American politics—the BSA is setting a dangerous precedent. By allowing the religiously-affiliated troops to still ban gay adults, the BSA is making a religious exemption seem like a reasonable compromise when in fact it is allowing the very people who would discriminate to keep discriminating.
And if I were a Republican contender for the presidency, I would immediately come out in support of the policy and claim victory, because this is just the kind of policy that GOP presidential candidates, and Republicans in Congress, have been promoting as a way to keep the anti-LGBT base of their party energized heading into the 2016 election, just as I described last week.
We’ve heard over and over from Jeb Bush about how we have to “safeguard religious liberty,” even as he claims to “respect” gay couples. While he recently came out for the idea of states—not the federal government—banning discrimination against LGBT Americans, he also argued there should be a religious exemption so that a florist, for example, should not have to serve a gay couple for their wedding.
By allowing some to discriminate by choice—at this particular juncture in American politics—the BSA is setting a dangerous precedent.
Meanwhile, Ted Cruz has been championing an Iowa couple who are closing their for-profit business—a restaurant, gift shop, floral boutique and wedding chapel all in one—because they refuse to follow Iowa law, having turned away gay couples for their weddings.
A GOP-promoted bill in Congress right now, the First Amendment Defense Act, described by the ACLU as “Indiana on steroids,” would put the sentiment of the Boy Scouts’ policy into law. The bill would allow individuals—as well as organizations, companies and public servants, as “individual” is defined broadly in the bill—to opt-out of engaging in actions or business if they have “a religious belief or moral conviction that marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or that sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.”
The BSA has been using the incremental approach, having ended the ban on gay youth (those under the age of 18) in 2013, and now moving to this new policy ending the ban on adults but with a religious exemption. Clearly they’re going in the right direction, but the 2013 partial-change should satisfy no one—not LGBT activists, nor religious groups. And attempting to “compromise” on civil rights sends a horrible message to young people.
The bright side is that this new policy doesn’t seem to be supported by the Mormon Church, the powerful entity the BSA leadership thought was down with the new policy—and which pours millions of dollars into the program. In a surprise move, leaders of the church yesterday threatened to pull support from the BSA now that a blanket ban on gay membership gone, even though they’d still be able to discriminate in their troops but unable to stomach even a half-measure of equality for others.
If they leave, good riddance, and hopefully the Catholic Church will follow if it can’t accept gay adults either. The quicker the BSA can move to banning discrimination entirely, the better. That will not only send the right message to all youth but it will diminish an absurd, dangerous notion of “compromise” on equality that the GOP and its faithful are right now trying to peddle to America.
This article was originally featured on the Huffington Post and reposted with permission.
Michelangelo Signorile is the Editor-at-large of the Huffington Post’s Gay Voices section. He is an author, journalist, and commentator, and the host of “The Michelangelo Signorile Show,” which airs each weekday on SiriusXM.
Photo via Florida Keys Public Libraries/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
Michelangelo Signorile is the Editor at Large of Huffington Post Gay Voices. Signorile has written for many publications, including New York magazine, New York Times, and the L.A. Times.