- Report: Google used shell companies to build data centers, obtain tax breaks Today 3:38 PM
- Grammy winner Kacey Musgraves spoiled ‘RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars 4’ Today 2:24 PM
- Conservatives feel vindicated by new developments in Jussie Smollett case Today 12:19 PM
- Don Cheadle made important fashion choices on ‘SNL’ Today 9:47 AM
- Why the Twitter left loves to dunk on Max Boot Today 6:30 AM
- How to watch ‘Last Week Tonight with John Oliver’ online for free Today 6:30 AM
- How to stream Francis Ngannou vs. Cain Velasquez for free Today 6:00 AM
- How to stream the 2019 Daytona 500 for free Today 5:50 AM
- 7-year-old YouTuber to get his own show on Nickelodeon Saturday 5:30 PM
- ‘Hipster’ jobs are trending, and Indeed says the market is booming Saturday 3:33 PM
- Trump meme removed after copyright complaint Saturday 2:15 PM
- Facebook pushes back against moderators complaining about ‘Big Brother’ environment Saturday 12:46 PM
- Twitter hid post from an account linked to Iran’s Supreme Leader Saturday 10:17 AM
- How to stream Leo Santa Cruz vs. Rafael Rivera for free Saturday 8:00 AM
- ‘Larry Charles’ Dangerous World of Comedy’ finds the balance between tragedy and comedy Saturday 7:30 AM
A new EU law, similar to the U.S.’s Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, sets two-year minimum penalties for hacking.
In the United States, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) assumed a high profile in the wake of Aaron Swartz’s suicide. Now, the European Union has approved a law which, will severely increase penalties for computer-oriented crimes.
CFAA, written decades ago, provides what many consider disproportionate penalties for and vague definitions of hacking. The law has been decried to the point that a California lawmaker is attempting to amend it with “Aaron’s Law.”
The EU law would standardize and increase penalties across the whole of the union. It would mandate two year minimum sentences for anyone so much as attempting to access any information system illegally. For attacks on infrastructure, such as refineries or rail systems, the sentences could go as high as five years.
It would also increase jail time for anyone intercepting electronic communications, as American intelligence has recently been accused of doing, or producing tools to do so, as Blue Coat and HP are accused of having done in Syria and Iran respectively.
Europe does not have a one-to-one relationship with the U.S. when it comes to the specific online threats it faces. For one thing, organized crime groups using botnets are thick as thieves in the former U.S.S.R., part of Europe, or on its border depending on how you define the continent.
Another aspect that affects how Europe deals with hacking is its privacy and data protection laws, which are, by and large, much stricter than their counterparts in the U.S. A number of European countries, and pan-European organizations, went after Google in the wake of its allegedly accidental capture of user information by Google Street View teams and tech.
Finally, the revelations of American electronic spying by the National Security Agency (NSA), courtesy of whistleblower Edward Snowden, have rocked Europeans back on their heels—the European public, if not its politicians and law enforcement authorities.
The European Parliament in Strasbourg approved the new law 541 to 91. Member states will have two years to manifest the law in their national law codes and enforcement regimes. Denmark alone has opted out, preferring to retain its current laws.
Curt Hopkins has over two decades of experience as a journalist, editorial strategist, and social media manager. His work has been published by Ars Technica, Reuters, Los Angeles Times, and San Francisco Chronicle. He is the also founding director of the Committee to Protect Bloggers, the first organization devoted to global free speech rights for bloggers