- Report: Disney yanks YouTube ad spending following child exploitation accusations Wednesday 7:56 PM
- These people are organizing Fyre Fest live-action role-play parties Wednesday 6:35 PM
- White woman berates Mexican restaurant manager for speaking Spanish Wednesday 4:12 PM
- In Pixar short ‘Kitbull,’ a cat and pit bull become unlikely friends Wednesday 3:48 PM
- Stop exploiting the Jussie Smollett case to discredit LGBTQ hate crime victims Wednesday 3:28 PM
- The best Netflix original movies of 2019 Wednesday 3:20 PM
- Pinterest is reportedly blocking vaccination searches Wednesday 2:53 PM
- Nike’s self-lacing smart sneakers malfunction days after release Wednesday 2:50 PM
- How to quickly get the Havoc weapon in Apex Legends Wednesday 2:48 PM
- The truth behind the anti-LGBTQ emoji controversy Wednesday 1:37 PM
- Tristan Thompson disables Instagram comments after reports he cheated on Khloe Kardashian Wednesday 11:25 AM
- Introducing ‘boner culture,’ this Gamergate blogger’s latest cause Wednesday 11:16 AM
- HBO debuts trailer for controversial Michael Jackson doc ‘Leaving Neverland’ Wednesday 10:46 AM
- Christian woman refuses to do taxes for lesbian married couple Wednesday 10:43 AM
- Political campaigns will be snooping on your phones in 2020 Wednesday 10:43 AM
Court rules same-sex couples refused licenses by Kim Davis can sue her for damages
Kim Davis, the Kentucky clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples citing religious reasons, can now be sued for damages, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.
After the U.S. Supreme Court legalized gay marriage in 2015, Davis denied several same-sex couples marriage licenses, including David Ermold and David Moore of Rowan County. They, along with two other couples, sued Davis, but the cases were all dismissed by a U.S. District judge on the grounds that Kentucky had changed its licensing policy to remove clerks’ names from marriage licenses, a request Davis had made.
Ermold and Moore, though, appealed the decision, and today the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that even though Kentucky changed its policies in 2016, it does not excuse the harm Davis caused the couples in 2015. Furthermore, it is “not a general challenge to Davis’ policy, but rather seeks damages for a particularized harm allegedly suffered by a specific set of plaintiffs,” the court wrote.
Now the case will circle back to the U.S. District judge. Should he choose to favor the couple, Davis could be held liable for damages.
Davis recently dropped her case against Kentucky, in which she claimed the state was violating her First Amendment rights. However, she is still appealing a ruling requiring her to issue licenses.
H/T the Cut
Anastassia Gliadkovskaya is a lifestyle and politics reporter. Her work has been published by Empire State Tribune and Urban Watch magazine.