- ‘Boogaloo’ memes are trying to organize a second civil war—and they’re spreading fast Today 3:48 PM
- People are disturbed by these McDonald’s-scented candles Today 3:47 PM
- Season 2 of ‘The Witcher’ is in production Today 3:16 PM
- Here are some cringey billboards Bloomberg ran in Arizona Today 2:51 PM
- PewDiePie returns to YouTube after 37-day hiatus Today 2:01 PM
- Why was a Republican Party Facebook page co-managed by someone in Turkmenistan? Today 1:26 PM
- The shorthand guide to ‘Star Wars: The Clone Wars’ Today 1:07 PM
- Congress urges Tinder to screen for sex offenders Today 1:03 PM
- Video shows 9-year-old threatening suicide after being bullied Today 12:01 PM
- Ex-Goldman Sachs CEO says he might vote Trump because Sanders is too mean to him Today 11:40 AM
- Twitch streamer says she was banned for body painting Today 11:39 AM
- Did BTS fans really cause TikTok to crash? (updated) Today 11:08 AM
- People are selling homemade tampons on Etsy Today 11:01 AM
- ‘Hunters’ review: Amazon’s Nazi-hunting series was a great idea, in theory Today 10:47 AM
- Warren drafts contract to release women from NDAs with Bloomberg (updated) Today 10:42 AM
The internet has promised a lot when it comes to scientific research. As the web becomes something most people can access quite easily, theoretically it should be easier to incorporate more diverse populations into research—something that’s hampered scientists for decades.
But a new, open access study in Genetics in Medicine found that participants in a genetics study who were black, who lived below the poverty line, or who did not graduate high school were much less likely to follow up with their research results than participants who were white, who lived above the poverty line, and who had at least a high school diploma.
The reasons for this discrepancy are unclear, the researchers said in a press release. They weren’t sure if people were less likely to follow up due to a lack of access to the internet, less computer literacy, or some other factor. The results are also surprising, because when the researchers interviewed the participants at the outset, all groups reported they were highly interested in seeing their results online.
In fact, most participants did not view their results. Of the entire group of 967, only 12 percent actually saw them. But the results were significant when researchers compared how many people from each of the demographic groups viewed their results.
In the paper, the researchers discussed how their findings present an obstacle for President Obama’s Precision Medicine Initiative, which emphasizes participants engaging in their own research. The results are also perplexing because in the age of Fitbits and the quantified self, people seem more interested than ever in seeing themselves reflected in data. The researchers even used a familiar platform, 23andMe, to do the genetic analysis.
But now that researchers know underrepresentation in research persists, they can begin to find ways to overcome it, making research more inclusive and ultimately more applicable for everyone.
Cynthia McKelvey covered the health and science for the Daily Dot until 2017. She earned a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California Santa Cruz in 2014. Her work has appeared in Gizmodo, Scientific American Mind, and Mic.com.