- PewDiePie becomes the first YouTuber to hit 100 million subscribers 3 Years Ago
- ‘Breaking Bad’ movie will show us what happened to Jesse Pinkman Today 9:39 AM
- How to stream ROH Wrestling’s Honor For All Today 7:30 AM
- How to stream Steelers vs. Titans in NFL preseason action Today 7:00 AM
- How to stream ‘Good Eats: The Return’ online Today 7:00 AM
- How to stream ‘Power’ season 6 Today 6:00 AM
- Your best bets for finding discounted and refurbished Airpods Today 6:00 AM
- How to stream Barcelona vs. Real Betis Saturday 11:31 PM
- How to stream Tottenham Hotspur vs. Newcastle Saturday 11:21 PM
- All of the ‘Avengers: Endgame’ Easter eggs discovered by fans Saturday 6:52 PM
- Every big announcement made at D23 about Disney+ Saturday 6:33 PM
- The best haunted house movies to watch online in 2019 Saturday 4:13 PM
- Andy Ngo seen laughing as Patriot Prayer members plan an attack in newly emerged video Saturday 3:59 PM
- How to stream Manchester City vs. Bournemouth Saturday 3:25 PM
- Catholic priest allegedly spent church money on Grindr hookups Saturday 3:04 PM
In a ruling that is the first of its kind, a New York court has ruled that a man violated a restraining order by following his ex-girlfriend on Instagram.
“The case raises a question of first impression,” Judge Steven M. Statsinger wrote in the Criminal Court of New York City’s ruling. “Does a defendant violate a full order of protection by making a request on Instagram to follow the complainant’s Instagram page?”
After finding that the man in the case—clothing designer Nicholas Lemons—had done so, the court denied his motion to dismiss his ex-girlfriend’s criminal complaint.
Lemons had been charged with criminal assault last year after allegedly attacking his ex-girlfriend. She subsequently obtained an order of protection that barred him from contacting her “by mail, telephone, e-mail, voice mail, or other electronic or any other means.”
Police charged Lemons with criminal contempt in September 2015 for sending the Instagram follow request.
Lemons argued that, because his request only triggered a notification on Instagram, it was not direct contact. But Judge Statsinger held that that was just a technicality.
“The situation described here is exactly the same as if the defendant, using his iPhone, had asked Siri to place a call to the complainant, instead of dialing her number himself,” Statsinger wrote. “Just as in this hypothetical there could be no legitimate claim that the defendant communicated only with Siri and did not himself telephone the complainant, here there can be no legitimate claim that the defendant communicated only with Instagram, and not with the complainant.”
Other courts have ruled in similar ways regarding Facebook interactions. A Pennsylvania man was found to be in violation of his ex-girlfriend’s restraining order after liking her Facebook photos, and a New York woman faced a year in prison for tagging her ex-sister-in-law in a picture on the site.
Jaya Saxena is a lifestyle writer and editor whose work focuses primarily on women's issues and web culture. Her writing has appeared in GQ, ELLE, the Toast, the New Yorker, Tthe Hairpin, BuzzFeed, Racked, Eater, Catapult, and others. She is the co-author of 'Dad Magazine,' the author of 'The Book Of Lost Recipes,' and the co-author of 'Basic Witches.'