- Trump accused of ‘using the language of ethnic cleansing’ regarding Kurds 6 Years Ago
- Hillary Clinton also thinks Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian bot 6 Years Ago
- TikTok girls dancing to voicemails from sh*tty exes is a vibe Today 12:34 PM
- Netflix reports strong growth—but it faces 3 major hurdles in Q4 Today 12:33 PM
- Telegram is hosting videos of extrajudicial killings in Syria Today 12:32 PM
- ‘El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie’ tops 8 million viewers in first week Today 11:31 AM
- ‘Uncut Gems’ brings a high-stakes gambling risk to life Today 11:29 AM
- Mark Zuckerberg gives a revisionist history about why he started Facebook in big speech Today 10:52 AM
- Would Hitler be allowed to tweet? Today 10:21 AM
- Twitch star Amouranth caught driving while streaming Today 9:26 AM
- John Mulaney rails on e-scooters after ‘baby boomer’ nearly hits his dog Today 9:07 AM
- How to stream Chelsea vs. Newcastle Today 9:00 AM
- How to stream Atletico Madrid vs. Valencia Today 9:00 AM
- ‘Bully. Coward. Victim.’ dives deep into the life of an ‘evil’ man Today 8:42 AM
- Paul Rudd acts his tail off in Netflix’s ‘Living With Yourself’ Today 8:15 AM
Was this tame photo too racy for Instagram?
Petra Collins’ photo of her bikini line was deemed deletable.
Petra Collins is a 20-year-old Canadian artist and fashion photographer who’s shot for Rookie and Vice. Like many photographers, she has her own Instagram account. Recently, it was deleted—due to one image of her bikini line.
Collins took to her Tumblr to discuss the deletion, which was not her choice, and the photo that caused it: A shot of her in underwear, with a bit of pubic hair showing. Collins was also behind a recent American Apparel shirt that featured a drawing of a menstruating vagina, which caused much hand-wringing on the Internet. She starts her essay there:
Collins then goes on to critique the media culture that measures women by their appearance and lists off all the things she and other women are “used to,” whether we like it or not. But the bigger issue here is the censorship of images, and what constitutes an offensive image.
— Kat Georgé (@kat_george) October 17, 2013
Collins found the deletion of her art to be indicative of a bigger issue:
“The deletion of my account felt like a physical act, like the public coming at me with a razor, sticking their finger down my throat, forcing me to cover up, forcing me to succumb to societies image of beauty. That these very real pressures we face everyday can turn into literal censorship. If the Internet mimics real life then there is no doubt that real life can mimic it. That if we allow ourselves to be silenced or censored it can happen in real life too. That if an online society of people can censor your body what stops them from doing so in real life. This is already happening, you experience this everyday. When someone catcalls at you, yells “SLUT,” comments on all your Facebook photos calling you “disgusting,” tries to physically violate you, spreads private nude images of you to a mass amount of people via text, calls you ugly, tells you to change your body, tells you are not perfect, this cannot continue to be our reality.”
That an image of a woman’s pubic hair, unaltered, was deemed deletable on Instagram is problematic, but it also highlights a bigger problem with women’s images, with women’s “natural state,” and the shaming that surrounds it.
Photo via Petra Collins/Facebook
Audra Schroeder is the Daily Dot’s senior entertainment writer, and she focuses on streaming, comedy, and music. Her work has previously appeared in the Austin Chronicle, the Dallas Observer, NPR, ESPN, Bitch, and the Village Voice. She is based in Austin, Texas.