- Amy Klobuchar reportedly ate salad with a comb, and Twitter’s got questions 7 Months Ago
- Nobody likes Spotify’s new update 7 Months Ago
- Student assaulted on campus while tabling for right-wing group Today 1:56 PM
- Kim Kardashian West sues fashion company for using her likeness to sell clothes Today 1:12 PM
- The Oscar-nominated movies you’ll actually want to watch again Today 12:56 PM
- Viral graphic shows the moment Apple became the top brand Today 12:27 PM
- Jake Paul calls out KSI for a YouTube boxing match Today 11:31 AM
- This elementary school made students play ‘runaway slave’ Today 11:20 AM
- ‘Captain Marvel’ is already a box office hit Today 11:06 AM
- This ‘buff bunny vs. small bunny’ meme is here for when you’re feeling inferior Today 10:53 AM
- Ocasio-Cortez slams trolls who come at her with ‘weak’ memes Today 10:52 AM
- YouTube just made it awfully easy to harass creators Today 10:16 AM
- Report: Trump the only 2020 contender who won’t rule out using stolen data Today 9:01 AM
- House Republicans offer bipartisan net neutrality bill—but there’s a catch Today 8:30 AM
- This Loki meme is the new way to play dumb Today 7:30 AM
SCOTUS/Oyez (Public Domain)
Some, however, see this as a window into a broken system.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has no plans on retiring anytime soon and believes she has “at least five more years” on the bench.
Speaking on Sunday after watching a play about late colleague Justice Antonin Scalia’s life, Ginsburg said, “I’m now 85. My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years.”
This confirmation from Ginsburg comes as a relief to many, who are concerned about Trump’s ability to stack the Supreme Court with conservative justices following the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy. SCOTUS already has five right-leaning appointees, and four left-leaning ones, including Kennedy, and another Republican nomination could put progressive policy in severe jeopardy for the next several decades. In particular, Trump has stated that a goal in changing the Supreme Court would be to overturn Roe v. Wade, which would be a crippling blow to reproductive justice and women’s rights in the United States. But Ginsburg isn’t anywhere close to calling it quits yet, and many people are celebrating her strength and tenacity.
"I think I have at least 5 more years" — Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 7/29/18 pic.twitter.com/ztkZKIxefq
— Julie Cohen (@FilmmakerJulie) July 30, 2018
85-year-old Ruth Bader Ginsburg today:
"I have about at least 5 more years" on Supreme Court .
In other words Trump won't be picking this amazing woman's replacement as long as she stays healthy.
Thank you Justice Ginsburg!!
— Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) July 30, 2018
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is going to work until she’s 90, so she’s basically an honorary millennial now.
— Evan DeSimone (@Smorgasboredom) July 30, 2018
However, others are pointing out what they see as a strange and broken system, where elderly justices have to “hang on” in order to prevent a decades-long imbalance of political power.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg may stay on the court until she is 90. I would say this about a conservative justice as much as a liberal justice: This isn't how a judicial system in a democracy should operate. https://t.co/msjp4n5y0E
— Alex Berezow (@AlexBerezow) July 30, 2018
It’s almost as if our basic civil rights *shouldn’t* depend on the stamina and life expectancy of one benevolent 85 year old. https://t.co/bCIKHyp1p4
— Moira Donegan (@MoiraDonegan) July 30, 2018
The law is so imbalanced in the highest court in the land when people are celebrating an octogenarian "holding on" for five more years when SCOTUS judges should have set term limits. #ruthbaderginsburg
— Not Your Woke Bae (@josephlboston) July 30, 2018
Critics of the Supreme Court see a lifetime appointment by the president as antithetical to democracy, both because citizens do not have a direct say in Supreme Court justices, and the iron-clad tenure justices hold in an ever-changing culture.
When asked about term limits for justices, Ginsburg seemed to think it was very unlikely. “You can’t set term limits, because to do that, you’d have to amend the Constitution,” the justice said. While many citizens may think this is a necessary change, it does not seem to be a relevant issue to decision makers in Washington.
Alex Dalbey is a writer and zinester currently working out of St. Paul, Minnesota. They have bylines at The Daily Dot, Kill Screen, and Bullet Points. Follow them on Twitter @thedialogtree