- Devin Nunes is suing Twitter over parody accounts of his mom, cow Monday 8:15 PM
- The best new movies at SXSW 2019 Monday 7:55 PM
- #AbledsAreWeird demonstrates how not to treat people with disabilities Monday 7:33 PM
- YouTubers keep uploading racist meme anthem played by New Zealand shooter Monday 5:38 PM
- Myspace confirms that a decade-plus of user-uploaded music is gone Monday 5:03 PM
- ‘Love, Death & Robots’ suffers from blatant sexism Monday 4:38 PM
- Khloe Kardashian faces backlash for Instagram post saying to ‘love thy racist neighbor’ Monday 4:07 PM
- This Twitter user wants to expose white YouTubers for racist, transphobic content Monday 3:55 PM
- Trump retweeted a QAnon supporter during his Twitter bender Monday 1:24 PM
- Katrina Pierson supports Trump tweeting more about Fox than New Zealand shooting Monday 1:19 PM
- PewDiePie’s alt-right ties are impossible to ignore Monday 1:05 PM
- With this blade, I protect this meme Monday 12:48 PM
- Lead actress in ‘The Color Purple’ revival criticized for homophobic post Monday 12:39 PM
- ‘Arrested Development’ ends the same way it did the first time—unceremoniously Monday 12:10 PM
- Alleged gunman tried to rob YouTuber Adam22 during livestream Monday 11:32 AM
Down in the dumps? You’re only making things worse.
Yes, researchers are now confirming what we’ve always suspected while trawling Facebook for anything of interest, becoming jealous of our friends’ projected lives, hoping against hope that we might “like” our way toward some momentary satisfaction: You’re only making things worse.
In a paper titled “Facebook Use Predicts Decline in Subjective Well-Being in Young Adults,” scientists from the University of Michigan and Belgium’s University of Leuven found that across a number of demographic factors, increased Facebook engagement correlated to declines in how a user felt “moment-to-moment” and overall satisfaction with life.
Participants in the experiment—around 19 years old, on average—were texted five times a day with inquiries about general mood (or “affect”), how much they had used Facebook since the last text, and any “direct” or face-to-face interaction they might have experienced.
In most cases, more Facebook time was a reliable predictor of lowered spirits, but curiously, those who had very little non-Facebook contact to begin with did not suffer much in connection with their added hours on the social-networking site. It was the people with real-life friends who experienced more pronounced negative feelings when scrolling through the newsfeed.
The findings come with some caveats, naturally: “First, although we observed statistically significant associations between Facebook usage and well-being, the sizes of these effects were relatively ‘small,’” the researchers wrote. “This should not, however, undermine their practical significance.” Even so, “[s]ubjective well-being is a multiply determined outcome—it is unrealistic to expect any single factor to powerfully influence it.”
On top of that, the correlational data doesn’t help us nail down a causal relationship: It could very well be the case that feeling low is what makes us use Facebook more, rather than vice versa. This would mean that Facebook doesn’t necessarily “undermine” social interaction, as we might suppose. The fact remains, however, that direct contact with other members of the species has been shown again and again to improve our well-being, while Facebook activity has so far failed to deliver similar cognitive benefits.
Whichever way you slice the data, one thing is painfully clear: Facebook chats and status updates, at least where psychology is concerned, bear only a passing resemblance to in-person conversations and group hangouts. What’s more, we likely won’t know the true differences between the two modes of contact until the long-term effects of social media reliance and immersion can be studied.
In the meantime, why not meet up with some buddies in the park for a picnic, or to throw the frisbee around. Even if it doesn’t make you happier, it certainly can’t hurt.
H/T: Scientific American | Photo by Martin Hajek/Flickr
Miles Klee is a novelist and web culture reporter. The former editor of the Daily Dot’s Unclick section, Klee’s essays, satire, and fiction have appeared in Lapham’s Quarterly, Vanity Fair, 3:AM, Salon, the Awl, the New York Observer, the Millions, and the Village Voice. He's the author of two odd books of fiction, 'Ivyland' and 'True False.'