- Baltimore still refuses to pay hackers who hit city with ransomware 6 Years Ago
- Net neutrality advocates slam ‘extremely troubling’ letter circulating among some House Dems Today 4:52 PM
- Moms and grandmas are infiltrating TikTok Today 4:35 PM
- Did Britain’s head Brexiter hide in a bus to avoid getting hit by a milkshake? Today 4:26 PM
- This woman who thought she saw a handmaid about to jump from a building is very relieved Today 4:18 PM
- Michael Avenatti allegedly defrauded Stormy Daniels to pay for a Ferrari Today 3:53 PM
- HBO has no plans for an Arya Stark spinoff series Today 3:28 PM
- Republicans and Democrats agree on dangers of facial recognition tech Today 3:18 PM
- Amazon is using video games and ‘swag bucks’ to incentivize workers Today 3:04 PM
- Here’s what’s coming and going on Netflix in June Today 2:46 PM
- This Michael Jackson makeup meme is sweeping TikTok Today 2:45 PM
- Homophobic preacher wants Pete Buttigieg to renounce fisting and rimming Today 2:33 PM
- ‘The Liar, the Snitch, and the War Crimes’: Twitter roasts news of Trump Jr. book deal Today 12:36 PM
- Polar Peak in Fortnite is cracking, and players think a dragon may be beneath the ice Today 12:07 PM
- ‘Rise of Skywalker’ first look reveals mysterious new characters Today 12:00 PM
Down in the dumps? You’re only making things worse.
Yes, researchers are now confirming what we’ve always suspected while trawling Facebook for anything of interest, becoming jealous of our friends’ projected lives, hoping against hope that we might “like” our way toward some momentary satisfaction: You’re only making things worse.
In a paper titled “Facebook Use Predicts Decline in Subjective Well-Being in Young Adults,” scientists from the University of Michigan and Belgium’s University of Leuven found that across a number of demographic factors, increased Facebook engagement correlated to declines in how a user felt “moment-to-moment” and overall satisfaction with life.
Participants in the experiment—around 19 years old, on average—were texted five times a day with inquiries about general mood (or “affect”), how much they had used Facebook since the last text, and any “direct” or face-to-face interaction they might have experienced.
In most cases, more Facebook time was a reliable predictor of lowered spirits, but curiously, those who had very little non-Facebook contact to begin with did not suffer much in connection with their added hours on the social-networking site. It was the people with real-life friends who experienced more pronounced negative feelings when scrolling through the newsfeed.
The findings come with some caveats, naturally: “First, although we observed statistically significant associations between Facebook usage and well-being, the sizes of these effects were relatively ‘small,’” the researchers wrote. “This should not, however, undermine their practical significance.” Even so, “[s]ubjective well-being is a multiply determined outcome—it is unrealistic to expect any single factor to powerfully influence it.”
On top of that, the correlational data doesn’t help us nail down a causal relationship: It could very well be the case that feeling low is what makes us use Facebook more, rather than vice versa. This would mean that Facebook doesn’t necessarily “undermine” social interaction, as we might suppose. The fact remains, however, that direct contact with other members of the species has been shown again and again to improve our well-being, while Facebook activity has so far failed to deliver similar cognitive benefits.
Whichever way you slice the data, one thing is painfully clear: Facebook chats and status updates, at least where psychology is concerned, bear only a passing resemblance to in-person conversations and group hangouts. What’s more, we likely won’t know the true differences between the two modes of contact until the long-term effects of social media reliance and immersion can be studied.
In the meantime, why not meet up with some buddies in the park for a picnic, or to throw the frisbee around. Even if it doesn’t make you happier, it certainly can’t hurt.
H/T: Scientific American | Photo by Martin Hajek/Flickr
Miles Klee is a novelist and web culture reporter. The former editor of the Daily Dot’s Unclick section, Klee’s essays, satire, and fiction have appeared in Lapham’s Quarterly, Vanity Fair, 3:AM, Salon, the Awl, the New York Observer, the Millions, and the Village Voice. He's the author of two odd books of fiction, 'Ivyland' and 'True False.'