- The 16-inch MacBook Pro is a beast, and it has a decent keyboard 6 Years Ago
- This group is scanning thousands of faces in Congress today to protest facial recognition 6 Years Ago
- Why everyone is debating Pete Buttigieg’s Medicare for All stance? Today 10:47 AM
- The Motorola Razr is a foldable homage to millennial nostalgia Today 10:22 AM
- The ‘I’m baby’ meme gets much more literal on TikTok Today 10:20 AM
- MrDeadMoth avoids jail time for assaulting pregnant partner during live stream Today 9:21 AM
- Deval Patrick 2020 fever is not catching on Today 9:08 AM
- How to stream Steelers vs. Browns on Thursday Night Football Today 8:13 AM
- How to stream Mexico vs. Netherlands in the U-17 World Cup semis Today 6:46 AM
- ‘Waves’ wrestles with the family drama and breaks it in half Today 6:30 AM
- QAnon-touting congressman sneaks ‘Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself’ into tweets Wednesday 7:12 PM
- Ocasio-Cortez met a famous drag queen–and the right melted down Wednesday 6:09 PM
- Woman says Lyft driver tried to kidnap her Wednesday 5:18 PM
- Debunking the right-wing conspiracy theories from the impeachment hearing Wednesday 4:29 PM
- Maroon 5 approves of the latest TikTok trend Wednesday 3:54 PM
Facebook may be bumming you out
Down in the dumps? You’re only making things worse.
Yes, researchers are now confirming what we’ve always suspected while trawling Facebook for anything of interest, becoming jealous of our friends’ projected lives, hoping against hope that we might “like” our way toward some momentary satisfaction: You’re only making things worse.
In a paper titled “Facebook Use Predicts Decline in Subjective Well-Being in Young Adults,” scientists from the University of Michigan and Belgium’s University of Leuven found that across a number of demographic factors, increased Facebook engagement correlated to declines in how a user felt “moment-to-moment” and overall satisfaction with life.
Participants in the experiment—around 19 years old, on average—were texted five times a day with inquiries about general mood (or “affect”), how much they had used Facebook since the last text, and any “direct” or face-to-face interaction they might have experienced.
In most cases, more Facebook time was a reliable predictor of lowered spirits, but curiously, those who had very little non-Facebook contact to begin with did not suffer much in connection with their added hours on the social-networking site. It was the people with real-life friends who experienced more pronounced negative feelings when scrolling through the newsfeed.
The findings come with some caveats, naturally: “First, although we observed statistically significant associations between Facebook usage and well-being, the sizes of these effects were relatively ‘small,’” the researchers wrote. “This should not, however, undermine their practical significance.” Even so, “[s]ubjective well-being is a multiply determined outcome—it is unrealistic to expect any single factor to powerfully influence it.”
On top of that, the correlational data doesn’t help us nail down a causal relationship: It could very well be the case that feeling low is what makes us use Facebook more, rather than vice versa. This would mean that Facebook doesn’t necessarily “undermine” social interaction, as we might suppose. The fact remains, however, that direct contact with other members of the species has been shown again and again to improve our well-being, while Facebook activity has so far failed to deliver similar cognitive benefits.
Whichever way you slice the data, one thing is painfully clear: Facebook chats and status updates, at least where psychology is concerned, bear only a passing resemblance to in-person conversations and group hangouts. What’s more, we likely won’t know the true differences between the two modes of contact until the long-term effects of social media reliance and immersion can be studied.
In the meantime, why not meet up with some buddies in the park for a picnic, or to throw the frisbee around. Even if it doesn’t make you happier, it certainly can’t hurt.
H/T: Scientific American | Photo by Martin Hajek/Flickr
Miles Klee is a novelist and web culture reporter. The former editor of the Daily Dot’s Unclick section, Klee’s essays, satire, and fiction have appeared in Lapham’s Quarterly, Vanity Fair, 3:AM, Salon, the Awl, the New York Observer, the Millions, and the Village Voice. He's the author of two odd books of fiction, 'Ivyland' and 'True False.'