kamala harris and tulsi gabbard

Juli Hansen/Shutterstock lev radin/Shutterstock (Licensed)

Are Kamala Harris’ supporters really that hyped Tulsi didn’t qualify?

A trending, confusing hashtag spreads.


David Covucci


This week, the Democratic National Committee trimmed the September debate field to 10, and some notable names from the August debates were left off. Marianne Williamson, John Delaney, Bill de Blasio, and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard won’t be onstage.

All had their moments in the sun in the past two debates: Williamson getting memed, Delaney getting ridiculed, de Blasio standing tall. And then there was Tulsi, who gained viral acclaim for her attacks on Sen. Kamala Harris’ (D-Calif.) record as a prosecutor.

That set of a firestorm of virality, recriminations, and wild speculation. Gabbard was accused of being a Russian agent and Twitter bots were accused of propping up her campaign. Harris’ people were furious that it became a trending topic on Twitter, practically accusing the entire social media network of being in the pocket of a foreign power.

Yet Gabbard just pointed out a bunch of things that were already known of Harris’ past.

Bad blood lingers, so when news of Gabbard’s inability to reach the new debate went live, a counterpoint to #KamalaHarrisDestroyed started cropping up and eventually started trending: #TulsiDidn’tQualifyParty.

But whether it received enough tweets from just Harris supporters to trend isn’t clear, because Gabbard’s own fans jumped on it quickly, too.

And despite a situation where Harris fans were upset that Gabbard’s clip of her debating Harris trended, Gabbard fans were equally ready to accuse Twiter of bias for allowing the anti-Gabbard hashtag trend.

If that makes no sense to you, that’s fine, because Twitter in 2019 is in a constant state of quantum superposition where everyone both is and isn’t a Russian bot.


The Daily Dot