GOP reportedly used Twitter to cheat election finance laws

Unethical, illegal—or both?

 

Rob Price

Tech

Published Nov 17, 2014   Updated May 30, 2021, 4:54 am CDT

The tangle of U.S. campaign finance laws just added another knot thanks to Twitter.

Featured Video Hide

In 2010, the Supreme Court’s Citizen United ruling opened the floodgates to effectively limitless campaign spending in the form of Super PACs: Politically-aligned lobbying organisations that are free to campaign for candidates and parties, constrained only by regulation against overt “coordination” between themselves and official campaigns.

Advertisement Hide

But even those bare minimum rules are being allegedly compromised by the GOP, CNN reports—with Republican groups covertly sharing internal polling data via Twitter.

CNN discovered multiple Twitter accounts “hidden in plain sight,” posting what seem to the untrained eye to be random strings of data. “CA-40/42-44/49-44/44-50/36-44/49-10/16/14-52->49/476-10s” is one example they give. But while nonsensical to the layman, the tweets reportedly actually referred to internal polling data, that could be used to focus efforts.

For example, a Super PAC could carry out an expensive poll indicating that a certain seat is winnable if sufficient resources are used. Unable to “coordinate” with the official campaign, it instead posts the polling data onto the Twitter account, where they can access it.

American Crossroads, American Action Network, and the National Republican Congressional Committee are among the groups with access to the data, a source told CNN. While all three refused to provide comment for the story, the offending Twitter accounts were deleted within minutes of CNN reaching out for comment.

The legality of the practice is unclear: “It might not be legal,” a spokesperson for the Campaign legal Center said. “It’s a cutting-edge practice, to my knowledge, the Federal Election Commission has never before addressed to explicitly determine its legality or permissibility.”

Advertisement Hide

The accounts themselves acknowledged this legal murkiness: One was named after character Bruno Gillianelli from The West Wing, “who pressed his colleagues to use ethically questionable ‘soft money’ to fund his campaigns.

The accounts investigated only had messages as far back as July 2014, and all pertained to the 2014 Midterms—but CNN’s source says that the practice has been ongoing for years, and messages are periodically purged.

H/T CNN | Illustration via Rob Price

Share this article
*First Published: Nov 17, 2014, 2:08 pm CST