- Conservatives are protesting YouTube’s new harassment rules Wednesday 5:36 PM
- YouTuber’s ‘creepy’ comment about Taylor Swift’s eggs gets ratioed Wednesday 5:31 PM
- Bloomberg razzed for accidentally making an Alexa Fleshlight Wednesday 5:29 PM
- Who is putting cowboy hats on pigeons? Wednesday 4:33 PM
- Scammer reportedly bribed Facebook employee to keep posts up Wednesday 3:36 PM
- The 1975’s singer criticized for ‘Islamophobic’ rant Wednesday 3:22 PM
- Ready to dish out $52K for Apple’s new Mac Pro? Wednesday 3:03 PM
- N.K. Jemisin and Jamal Campbell discuss their new Green Lantern comic, ‘Far Sector’ Wednesday 3:00 PM
- YouTube says it will be harsher on creators with ‘patterns of harassing behavior’ Wednesday 1:15 PM
- Why one senator stopped a vote on net neutrality Wednesday 12:49 PM
- Man reportedly denied refugee status after officials fail to forward email Wednesday 12:09 PM
- ‘Jojo Rabbit’ star to lead Disney+ ‘Home Alone’ reboot Wednesday 12:08 PM
- Beyoncé and Kelly Rowland were harassed by Jagged Edge as teens, Mathew Knowles says Wednesday 11:52 AM
- White nationalist Nick Fuentes is upset MTV aired his white nationalist views Wednesday 11:37 AM
- Juice WRLD had secret drug-littered Instagram, according to his ex-girlfriend Wednesday 11:10 AM
If you could implant a microchip in your head to get continuous access to the Internet and all things digital, would you? One in four Americans would, according to new data from communications and strategy firm Vrge.
It seems like an idea straight out of science fiction that usually completely backfires, and while there’s certainly no brain implant that can control Internet access available to the public today, the possibility does underscore our complete dependence on wireless technology and how addicted people are to staying connected to the world at all times.
Vrge polled 1,002 adults across the U.S., and discovered that a full 25 percent would be willing to safely implant a chip in their brains to get Internet access—compared to just 11 percent from a similar poll in 2008. And apparently men are much more open to the idea. Thirty-five percent of men would be down for the procedure, but only 15 percent of women said the same.
Already people are experimenting with their bodies to figure out how censors, magnets, RFID chips, and other technology can track and store data to augment the human body. Grindhouse Wetware, for instance, is one of the most popular biohacking groups, and the hackers and engineers involved create open-source technologies for hacking the body that can be placed under the skin. Others, like salesman Rich Lee, are implanting technology in more private parts of the body an attempt to have better sex.
Some scientists are already thinking about Internet-connected brains—much the same way our phones have limitless access to the Web at our fingertips, implantable brain chips could do the same for the entirety of our bodies.
It’s an idea that Anders Sandberg, a neuroscientist and transhumanist at Oxford’s Future of Humanity Institute, thinks is possible far in the future, The Atlantic reported. In theory, not only could you have access to the entire Web, but also connect to other people’s brains via wireless chips. It’s similar to the idea the “borgs” had at MIT in the 1990s—the pioneers of wearable computing who eventually went on to work for Google—who thought the Internet and people’s collective memories and interests could be shared through wearable devices.
Bodyhackers’ primary goals aren’t necessarily to be connected to the Internet forever, but rather to enhance their bodies with digital technologies that already exist, but Vrge’s poll numbers show that a growing number of people are more open to the idea of becoming one with technology.
Interestingly, while some study participants are willing to amplify their brains with chips, many of them also think new technologies are focused on more privileged users. Forty three percent said new technologies make “lives of the rich easier and better,” while only 35 percent said tech is “bridging the gap between the rich and the poor.” Young people aged 18 to 24 are even more convinced technology is built for more privileged people—a full 52 percent.
Of course, brain chips may or may not be a part of the far-distant future, and they would undoubtedly be subject to the same privacy and policy issues that our mobile devices and online data already face. And while technologies like Google Glass that push data directly into our eyeballs are still so controversial, head implants are a far-off pipe dream, but our addiction to the Internet and our willingness to do almost anything to get it almost certainly is not.
Photo via double-m/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
Selena Larson is a technology reporter based in San Francisco who writes about the intersection of technology and culture. Her work explores new technologies and the way they impact industries, human behavior, and security and privacy. Since leaving the Daily Dot, she's reported for CNN Money and done technical writing for cybersecurity firm Dragos.