- ‘The Mandalorian’ opens up its mythology even further in ‘Chapter 2’ 6 Years Ago
- Want to buy a drone on a budget? We’ve got you covered 6 Years Ago
- ‘Simpsons’ writer accuses Republicans of stealing Sideshow Bob’s defense 6 Years Ago
- Keanu Reeves’ appearance in ‘SpongeBob Movie’ trailer quickly becomes a meme 6 Years Ago
- Charli XCX makes the band in Netflix’s ‘Nasty Cherry’ 6 Years Ago
- Taylor Swift’s distress call reignites fight with Scooter Braun and former label 6 Years Ago
- How to disable autoplay for previews and trailers on Disney+ 6 Years Ago
- Trump accused of witness intimidation for tweets during impeachment hearing Today 11:48 AM
- Roger Stone convicted Today 11:34 AM
- FCC to replace comment system that got spammed during net neutrality fight Today 11:31 AM
- How to stream Mexico vs. Panama live in Concacaf Nations League Today 11:05 AM
- How to stream U.S. vs. Canada live in the Concacaf Nations League rematch Today 10:52 AM
- Dave Rubin freaks out over hoax that he didn’t eat this steak Today 10:37 AM
- 20 ugly sweaters that’ll make your spirits bright Today 10:32 AM
- A beginner’s guide to Mandalorians in the ‘Star Wars’ universe Today 10:02 AM
Owner of ‘America’s dirtiest hotel’ can’t sue TripAdvisor
Unfortunately, the ranking holds about as much weight as an online listicle called “Potato Potato Potato.”
Thick dirt in a bathtub. Boarded-up windows. Ripped, bloody bedspreads. This Tennessee hotel was deemed America’s dirtiest in 2011 after TripAdvisor reviewers gave it a few retch-inducing flaws. That ranking caused irreparable damage to the hotel’s business and reputation, its owner argued. Too bad he can’t sue.
A federal appeals court ruled Wednesday owner Kenneth Seaton has no defamation case against TripAdvisor—because the ranking holds about as much weight as an online listicle called “Potato Potato Potato.”
Seaton claimed in his $10 million lawsuit that TripAdvisor’s ranking of his Grand Resort Hotel and Convention Center in Pigeon Forge, which has since closed, stemmed from flawed ratings relying on “unsubstantiated rumors.” TripAdvisor claimed it determined the ranking based on how guests rated the hotel for cleanliness, Reuters reported.
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, upholding an Aug. 2012 district court ruling, deemed that travelers would not reasonably believe it is the filthiest hotel in the country.
“Even the most careless reader must have perceived that ‘dirtiest’ is simply an exaggeration and that Grand Resort is not, literally, the dirtiest hotel in the United States,” Circuit Judge Karen Nelson Moore said.
The tone of the list, based on reader comments, was more entertaining than factual, said Moore. She equated it to a poll calling Tom Hanks the most trustworthy person in the U.S. and suggested such online lists are opinion, not fact.
The hotel closed in November and was sold, according to reports. One reviewer claimed a bank took ownership. However, it’s still listed on TripAdvisor, where 226 of the 321 reviews rate it as “terrible.”
The appeals court also claimed website operators “deserve broad protection from lawsuits over reader-generated reviews,” Reuters noted.
“It is a victory for online review sites by letting them not only publish user comments but also draw conclusions,” Jeffrey Hermes, director of the Digital Media Law Project at Harvard University, told Reuters. “This helps journalists and researchers who work with user-submitted data to inform the public.”
Photo via TripAdvisor
Based in Montreal, Kris Holt has been writing about technology and web culture since 2010. He writes for Engadget and Tech News World, and his byline has also appeared in Paste, Salon, International Business Times, Mashable, and elsewhere.