- Did Amazon give ‘Marvelous Mrs. Maisel’ an unfair Emmy advantage? 3 Years Ago
- ‘The Politician’ is a dark and cynical answer to ‘Glee’ Today 7:00 AM
- Netflix’s ‘Ozark’ beat ‘Game of Thrones’ in 2 major Emmy categories Today 6:37 AM
- Animator for Netflix’s ‘Carmen Sandiego’ says he was fired after asking for fair pay Sunday 3:17 PM
- YouTube reverses decision to remove creators’ badges Sunday 1:47 PM
- How video game developer Valve got served secret subpoena as part of FBI’s counterterrorism fight Sunday 12:31 PM
- Aron Eisenberg, ‘Star Trek: Deep Space Nine’ actor, dead at 50 Sunday 11:35 AM
- Who needs glass slippers? This Cinderella cosplayer upgraded with a stunning glass arm Sunday 10:19 AM
- How to check if Yahoo owes you $358 Sunday 9:25 AM
- How to stream Bears vs. Redskins on Monday Night Football Sunday 7:00 AM
- What are the best alternatives to the electoral college? Sunday 6:30 AM
- The best PS4 games you can’t play anywhere else Sunday 6:00 AM
- How to watch the 2019 Emmy Awards Sunday 5:00 AM
- How to stream ‘Power’ season 6, episode 5 Sunday 4:00 AM
- Former developer at software company deletes his code to protest its ties to ICE Saturday 4:21 PM
3 major record labels file copyright lawsuit against YouTube ripping site
The party may be over.
BY GEOFF WEISS
The music industry’s beef with YouTube has been well documented, but in a new lawsuit filed by a slew of major record labels, the defendant is a German stream ripping company called YouTube-mp3.org. Stream ripping sites like YouTube-mp3.org enable users to download MP3 audio files from streaming YouTube videos.
The copyright suit was filed today in California federal court by the recording industry’s three major labels—Universal, Warner, and Sony— as well as other labels, according to Billboard. “Tens or even hundreds of millions of tracks are illegally copied and distributed by stream ripping services each month,” according to the suit. YouTube-mp3.org is believed to be run by a German man named Philip Matesanz and accounts for tens of millions of users and 40 percent of all stream ripping worldwide, according to the plaintiffs.
Each of the aforementioned labels is seeking $150,000 for each song that has been illegally downloaded. YouTube is not named as a party in the lawsuit, Billboard notes.
But a rise in stream ripping isn’t the recording industry’s only problem with YouTube. The three major labels are reportedly banning together to ask the federal government to change the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which states that platforms like YouTube aren’t necessarily liable for any copyrighted content that they happen to host. And this is a case that is being publicly supported by many of the world’s top artists.
In response, YouTube says that its automated Content ID system, which tracks unauthorized content and lets copyright holders either monetize or take down offending videos, is responsible for 99.5 percent of all claims related to music.