- Groom’s mother sabotages wedding by tricking guests into wearing jorts and hoodies 3 Years Ago
- No one believes Bill de Blasio’s son sent him these debate prep texts Today 3:26 PM
- Meek Mill, Jay-Z to release ‘Free Meek’ documentary on Amazon Prime Today 3:20 PM
- 3 ways to secure your Nest cameras Today 3:15 PM
- This Pokémon generator site is creating hilarious monsters Today 2:48 PM
- MrBeast impersonator tricks kid into destroying his XBox Today 12:50 PM
- This mom has the perfect nickname for her nonbinary kid Today 12:25 PM
- Netflix tests pop-out player that will allow viewers to multitask Today 11:44 AM
- Man allowed to sue media publishers over readers’ Facebook comments Today 11:42 AM
- Republicans slammed for joke about ‘heavily armed militia’ at Oregon statehouse Today 11:30 AM
- New bill wants tech companies to tell you how much your data is worth Today 10:53 AM
- AOC has the best response to Steve King’s ‘concentration camp’ criticism Today 10:19 AM
- Did Jake Paul and Tana Mongeau just get engaged? Today 9:26 AM
- Leaked documents reveal all the ‘red flags’ about Trump officials Today 9:02 AM
- Elon Musk, who wants to colonize space, thought the moon was Mars Today 8:56 AM
3 major record labels file copyright lawsuit against YouTube ripping site
The party may be over.
BY GEOFF WEISS
The music industry’s beef with YouTube has been well documented, but in a new lawsuit filed by a slew of major record labels, the defendant is a German stream ripping company called YouTube-mp3.org. Stream ripping sites like YouTube-mp3.org enable users to download MP3 audio files from streaming YouTube videos.
The copyright suit was filed today in California federal court by the recording industry’s three major labels—Universal, Warner, and Sony— as well as other labels, according to Billboard. “Tens or even hundreds of millions of tracks are illegally copied and distributed by stream ripping services each month,” according to the suit. YouTube-mp3.org is believed to be run by a German man named Philip Matesanz and accounts for tens of millions of users and 40 percent of all stream ripping worldwide, according to the plaintiffs.
Each of the aforementioned labels is seeking $150,000 for each song that has been illegally downloaded. YouTube is not named as a party in the lawsuit, Billboard notes.
But a rise in stream ripping isn’t the recording industry’s only problem with YouTube. The three major labels are reportedly banning together to ask the federal government to change the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which states that platforms like YouTube aren’t necessarily liable for any copyrighted content that they happen to host. And this is a case that is being publicly supported by many of the world’s top artists.
In response, YouTube says that its automated Content ID system, which tracks unauthorized content and lets copyright holders either monetize or take down offending videos, is responsible for 99.5 percent of all claims related to music.