- People are not falling for these ICE ‘propaganda’ photos Sunday 4:23 PM
- CLIF Bar and KIND Snacks are in a bizarre social media war Sunday 2:55 PM
- Caillou is how tall? Sunday 1:32 PM
- No, that video of a Boston Dynamics robot attacking its creators is not real Sunday 12:40 PM
- Alex Jones places $1 million bounty on culprit who planted child porn on his InfoWars server Sunday 12:03 PM
- ‘Stranger Things’ star’s new Netflix prank show is receiving backlash Sunday 9:04 AM
- How to watch ‘City on a Hill’ for free Sunday 8:00 AM
- How to watch ‘Euphoria’ for free Sunday 7:00 AM
- Meet the home brewer turning beer into a case for net neutrality Sunday 6:30 AM
- How to watch the U.S. vs. Chile at the World Cup for free Sunday 6:15 AM
- 15 teen movies on Netflix that will make you laugh, cry, and cringe Sunday 6:00 AM
- How to watch Estrella TV online for free Sunday 5:00 AM
- People are roasting this ‘traditional’ take on marriage with a hilarious meme Saturday 5:17 PM
- The internet just collectively realized that the Neopets of the world must be hungry Saturday 4:00 PM
- Alt-right message board 8chan was served a search warrant Saturday 3:06 PM
YouTube’s refusal to remove 20,000 songs has some of music’s biggest names up in arms.
The problem stems from publishing rights. According to claims, YouTube has made deals with record labels and many publishers, not with recently formed music rights organization, Global Music Rights (GMR), reports Time. The company, helmed by music executive Irving Azoff, has so far signed 42 musicians to its roster, including Pharrell Williams, Smokey Robinson, The Eagles, and Chris Cornell, among others. The group controls the 20,000 songs that Azoff demanded the platform remove via letter, but YouTube has yet to comply.
Azoff says he’s not at lawsuit stage just yet, but a letter from GMR’s counsel Howard King to YouTube general counsel Kent Walker outlines the company’s grievances and demands that YouTube comply with their takedown wishes, or produce documentation that proves they are within their rights.
“Obviously, if YouTube contends that it has properly licensed any of the songs for public broadcast, a contention we believe to be untrue, demand is hereby made that we be furnished with documentation of such licenses,” writes King.
YouTube may believe it is covered under multiyear licenses from publishing houses like ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC. In the communication from King and Azoff, none of the actual songs or content are named, something necessary for YouTube to identify potential infringing material among the countless hours of content uploaded to the site daily. Instead, it’s a blanket demand for the takedown of the songs under GMR’s umbrella.
In the recent Viacom ruling over Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) rights, the courts upheld that Internet service providers must have actual knowledge of infringement and must be provided “specific instances of infringement” by complainants. The Azoff letter could be a negotiating tactic to get YouTube to the table to hammer out better terms for his 42 artists.
If the dispute does progress further, the bill could rack up to the $1 billion mark thanks to $150,000 in statutory damages per willful copyright infringement.
“We’ve done deals with labels, publishers, collection societies and more to bring artists’ music into YouTube Music Key beta,” a YouTube spokesperson told The Daily Dot via email. “We’ll keep working with both the music community and with the music fans invited to our beta phase.”
H/T BusinessInsider | Illustration by Jason Reed
A former YouTube reporter for the Daily Dot, Rae Votta has more than a decade of experience in the digital and entertainment industries. Her work has appeared on AOL, Huffington Post, Out Magazine, Logo, VH1, Current TV, Billboard, and NYMag. She joined Netflix in 2016.