- Netflix thriller ‘Earthquake Bird’ can’t solve its own mystery Monday 4:45 PM
- Goop is selling an expensive ‘restraining arts’ BDSM kit Monday 4:17 PM
- Body positivity actress Lili Reinhart calls out Photoshopping app Monday 3:42 PM
- ‘Rick and Morty’ zeroes in on connections and leans into familiar territory Monday 3:30 PM
- People are sharing photos of how much they’ve changed in a decade Monday 2:30 PM
- A few of our favorite things on Newegg are on sale for Black Friday Monday 2:15 PM
- Disney adds ‘Bob’s Burgers’ movie back to release schedule after accidentally yanking it Monday 2:02 PM
- Ocasio-Cortez launches petition demanding Stephen Miller’s resignation Monday 1:24 PM
- Prince Andrew’s defense against child sex crimes stokes conspiracy theory flames Monday 1:20 PM
- More people may be looking to cancel Disney+ than Netflix Monday 1:09 PM
- Monday Night Football: How to stream Chiefs vs. Chargers live Monday 1:00 PM
- After days of deadly protests, Iran implements ‘largest internet shutdown ever’ Monday 12:55 PM
- ‘Disney Plus and thrust’ is apparently the new Netflix and Chill Monday 12:32 PM
- Woman fired, sued after coworker shared their sexts Monday 12:22 PM
- Group running GoFundMe for border wall breaks ground without permits Monday 11:47 AM
There is really no point treading lightly here: Seeing Other People, a webseries written by and starring Brooke Van Poppelen (truTV’s Hack My Life, Comedy Central) and Giulia Rozzi (The Jim Gaffigan Show, Chelsea Lately) isn’t very good.
It is almost intriguing just how disjointed something so short can be. Confused itself by what we’re supposed to find funny, it jumps around tonally—frequently interrupted by animations that often serve only to recap (in a five-minute episode) what just occurred. All this while pivoting an entire series off a premise that would’ve been played for a single tired laugh in a ’90s sitcom.
That premise is this—one of two couples, who have hung out together for four years, decides to “break up” with the other. You can no doubt foresee the structural reasons for providing this scenario; it allows a cavalcade of weird characters to be trotted out as each, now separated, couple looks to make new friends.
Likewise you will also understand why this sort of this setup would never be allowed to fill more than five minutes of that aforementioned ’90s sitcom. Because once the brief amusement surrounding the contrived substitution of a couple in the place ordinarily reserved for a single person subsides, the viewer is left with a bunch of characters who don’t behave like normal people. Which is fine, of course, but you can’t expect to easily extract pedestrian relationship gags when the landscape has been shifted.
It’s all a bit sad. Because those animations—by Patrick Hosmer, who also features—actually look pretty swell, and there is undeniable enthusiasm.
But it is a misstep. An attempt to stretch out a comedically finite scenario with little thought as to the effect it would have on the rest of the series. As such it is off the mark, and for both their sakes and futures in comedy, you kind of hope the creators now realize that as well.
Tom Harrington is an entertainment reporter whose work for the Daily Dot focused on webseries and streaming entertainment. He's reviewed series on YouTube and Netflix, and he was approximately four years ahead of the curve on comedian Joe Pera.