- iPhone overloaded? Here’s how to cancel app subscriptions Monday 11:02 PM
- Fan-created ‘app’ lets users experience the final moments of the ill-fated Jeremy Renner app Monday 10:00 PM
- Milo Yiannopoulos receives lifetime ban from furry convention Monday 7:49 PM
- Snapchat just made all political ads purchased publicly available Monday 6:12 PM
- How to stream Barcelona vs. Borussia Dortmund in Champions League action Monday 5:39 PM
- How to stream Liverpool vs. Napoli in Champions League action Monday 5:19 PM
- How to make real money with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk Monday 5:03 PM
- How to stream Chelsea vs. Valencia in the Champions League group stage Monday 4:47 PM
- ‘SNL’ fires Shane Gillis for racist, homophobic comments Monday 4:41 PM
- Ben Shapiro wants accusers to describe Brett Kavanaugh’s penis Monday 4:30 PM
- Twitch suspends streamer for wearing Chun-Li cosplay Monday 4:11 PM
- Report: 8 years of Trump tax returns subpoenaed by prosecutors Monday 3:45 PM
- Netflix lands exclusive streaming rights to ‘Seinfeld’ Monday 3:34 PM
- Jenny Slate sets first comedy special at Netflix Monday 3:05 PM
- #EndSmearFear is aiming to save lives Monday 2:54 PM
Drake’s label takes down negative album review with DMCA request
The British Phonographic Industry, representing Universal, claimed an About.com review page was illegally sharing the rapper’s latest album.
No one would argue that the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA), which allows copyright holders to ask sites like Google to stop linking to places that illegally host their content, is a perfect system.
One example of that system not working out? When a music reviewer posts an unfavorable review of Drake’s latest album, and Drake’s label falsely tells Google that the review contains copyrighted material.
That’s what happened to Henry Adaso, who wrote a short, somewhat dismissive review of Drake’s Take Care in November.
In 51 words for About.com, Adaso called the album “sometimes lazy” and a “safe alternative to sleeping pills,” though he also says it’s “sometimes brilliant.”
Nevertheless, the British Phonographic Industry, which represents Drake’s label, Universal, sent a legal notice to Google on June 30. In it, the BPI claimed that Adaso’s review was one of 23 sites they’d found that illegally shared the album.
It’s likely that this was incompetence, rather than suppression: The BPI’s list also includes the A.V. Club’s very positive review of the album.
Still, it highlights how easy it is for content companies to direct search engines to stop referring to sites. While it’s illegal to knowingly issue a false DMCA takedown, and companies are sometimes punished for doing so, there are rarely repercussions for copyright holders who issue broad DMCA claims.
Once Adaso found out about the takedown, he wrote on his site, “I can’t shake the suspicion that [Universal] is trying to purge the web of unfavorable reviews.”
“The game is rigged,” he said.
Photo via Wikimedia Commons
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.