- Leaked documents reveal all the ‘red flags’ about Trump officials 6 Years Ago
- Elon Musk, who wants to colonize space, thought the moon was Mars 6 Years Ago
- How to watch ‘Legion’ for free 6 Years Ago
- Netflix’s ‘Bolívar’ reduces hero’s tale to irredeemable melodrama 6 Years Ago
- How to watch the U.S. vs. Spain at the World Cup for free Today 7:55 AM
- How to watch ‘The Hills: New Beginnings’ for free Today 7:40 AM
- Inside the pornographic video game that took Kickstarter by storm Today 7:00 AM
- Why everyone wants to debate AOC, and no one wants to debate Ilhan Omar Today 6:30 AM
- How to watch the Trvl Channel online for free Today 5:30 AM
- Are we going to get a ‘Community’ movie on Netflix? Sunday 2:46 PM
- Social networking site Ravelry bans all posts that are supportive of Trump and his administration Sunday 2:07 PM
- YouTube is testing hiding its comments section Sunday 1:23 PM
- Think you have what it takes to be Beyoncé’s assistant for the day? Sunday 1:02 PM
- Facebook co-founder warns against Libra, the company’s new cryptocurrency Sunday 12:04 PM
- Missing YouTuber Etika’s belongings found alongside bridge Sunday 9:16 AM
A new study shows how moderators suppress ideas on Sina Weibo, through systematic blocking of keywords and users.
With a population of a billion people, most of whom seem to be on the Web at any given time, China is the acknowledged champion of online censorship. It’s no small task, combining filtering technology, societal pressure, laws and the threat of imprisonment to keep the riotous Chinese Internet in line.
Now, Rice University, Bowdoin College and the University of New Mexico have released a study that took a detailed look at how the Chinese authorities censor Sina Weibo, the Twitter-like microblogging service that is hugely popular in the country. Weibo has almost 400 million registered users who post about 100 million messages a day.
The findings outlined in “The Velocity of Censorship: High-Fidelity Detection of Microblog Post Deletions” are based on a study of “users likely to participate in sensitive topics” on Weibo.
- Authorities take down 12 percent of posts on Weibo, about 12 million posts per day.
- 30 percent of deleted posts are taken down within five to 30 minutes.
- 90 percent of deletions happen within 24 hours.
- Topics where “mass removal happens the fastest” combine events that are popular on Weibo (Beijing rainstorms or a sex scandal) with themes common to sensitive posts (Beijing, government, China, and policeman).
The research led the study’s authors to a set of hypotheses about how Chinese authorities recognize and delete posts on Weibo, backed up with data from the study.
These methods are analogous to what the Chinese authorities do to the Internet as a whole insofar as they cast a wide net and attack the “problem” from a number of different angles. As the authors write, “Our results suggest that Weibo employs a distributed, heterogeneous strategy for censorship that has a great amount of defense-in-depth.”
Based on past patterns of Weibo censorship, this is how the researchers assume the social network’s moderators operate:
- There is a surveillance keyword list that triggers for posts to be looked at by a moderator for possible deletion.
- Weibo targets speciﬁc users, such as those who frequently post sensitive content.
- When a sensitive post is found, a moderator will ﬁnd all of its related reposts (parent, child, etc.), and delete them all at once.
- Weibo removes posts retroactively via keyword search, causing spikes in the deletion rate of a particular keyword within a short amount of time.
- The censors work relatively independently, in a distributed fashion. Some of them may work in their spare time.
- Deletion speed is related to the topic; that is, particular topics are targeted for deletion based on how sensitive they are.
Even though it’s nearly impossible to suppress ideas on the Internet, this system manages a pretty close approximation by quickly and efficiently censoring keywords and individual users.
Curt Hopkins has over two decades of experience as a journalist, editorial strategist, and social media manager. His work has been published by Ars Technica, Reuters, Los Angeles Times, and San Francisco Chronicle. He is the also founding director of the Committee to Protect Bloggers, the first organization devoted to global free speech rights for bloggers