- Twitter lifts ‘permanent’ suspension of activist Barrett Brown Monday 5:52 PM
- Billie Eilish fans fend off objectifying comments on tank top photo Monday 5:32 PM
- Groom’s mother sabotages wedding by tricking guests into wearing jorts and hoodies Monday 4:39 PM
- No one believes Bill de Blasio’s son sent him these debate prep texts Monday 3:26 PM
- Meek Mill, Jay-Z to release ‘Free Meek’ documentary on Amazon Prime Monday 3:20 PM
- 3 ways to secure your Nest cameras Monday 3:15 PM
- This Pokémon generator site is creating hilarious monsters Monday 2:48 PM
- MrBeast impersonator tricks kid into destroying his XBox Monday 12:50 PM
- This mom has the perfect nickname for her nonbinary kid Monday 12:25 PM
- Netflix tests pop-out player that will allow viewers to multitask Monday 11:44 AM
- Man allowed to sue media publishers over readers’ Facebook comments Monday 11:42 AM
- Republicans slammed for joke about ‘heavily armed militia’ at Oregon statehouse Monday 11:30 AM
- New bill wants tech companies to tell you how much your data is worth Monday 10:53 AM
- AOC has the best response to Steve King’s ‘concentration camp’ criticism Monday 10:19 AM
- Did Jake Paul and Tana Mongeau just get engaged? Monday 9:26 AM
Republicans want to make sure the FCC can’t tell ISPs what to charge for Internet access.
The House passed a bill Friday morning to prevent the FCC from regulating what Internet service providers can charge Americans for Internet access.
A concise piece of legislation, the No Rate Regulation of Broadband Internet Access Act reads, “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Federal Communications Commission may not regulate the rates charged for broadband Internet access service.”
The bill, sponsored by Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), passed 241-173, with five Democrats voting for passage.
Congressional Democrats and open-Internet groups have sharply criticized the bill, arguing that it is vague and would open the door to telecom-industry lawsuits over FCC enforcement actions unrelated to Internet price regulation.
The FCC is currently scrutinizing the wireless industry’s practice of zero-rating, or excluding certain services from customers’ monthly mobile data caps, which opponents say unfairly elevates those services over competitors that aren’t included in zero-rating programs. Critics of the rate-regulation bill worry that, if it becomes law, ISPs could use it to sue the FCC for blocking zero-rating or other controversial practices.
House Speaker Paul Ryan applauded the lower chamber for passing the bill, saying it “protects Americans’ Internet freedom.”
“There is no authority or need for the federal government to regulate the Internet,” Ryan said in a statement. “Today, Congress took action to ensure that the Internet remains a free market. This initiative blocks unelected bureaucrats in Washington from dictating how people use the Internet.”
The White House said on Tuesday that President Obama would veto the bill if it reached his desk.
The rate-regulation bill is part of a broader Republican attack on the FCC’s net-neutrality rules, which permit the commission to block unfair ISP practices like throttling access to websites or charging extra for faster access to content.
Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technology, said on the House floor before the vote that the 2015 Open Internet Order was “the new environment when you treat the Internet like an old dial-up phone.”
House Democrats offered three amendments to the rate-regulation bill intended to ensure that it would not affect tangential or unrelated FCC activity, but Republicans defeated those amendments before the final vote. One such amendment would add language to the bill allowing the agency to continue regulating activity “in the public interest.”
Walden quickly rose to attack that proposal.
“When you give the bureaucracy wide open language,” he said of the amendment, “it sounds good on its face, but the practical impact for someone who wants to regulate … they go, ‘Well, we think that [it] is in the public interest to bring down [Internet prices] after the fact.’”
FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler had already promised not to use the authority included in the net-neutrality order to tell ISPs what they could charge for broadband access, but congressional Republicans worried about “post-facto” rate regulation, where the commission would, as Walden suggested, fine ISPs for charging rates that it subsequently deemed unfair.
Update 11:38am CT, April 15: Added comment from House Speaker Ryan.
Eric Geller is a politics reporter who focuses on cybersecurity, surveillance, encryption, and privacy. A former staff writer at the Daily Dot, Geller joined Politico in June 2016, where he's focused on policymaking at the White House, the Justice Department, the State Department, and the Commerce Department.