- The Marvel movies you actually need to see before ‘Avengers: Endgame’ 7 Years Ago
- Twitter launches new tool to combat misinformation about voting 7 Years Ago
- These Cards Will Get You Drunk is the game with one very obvious purpose Today 8:20 AM
- Conservative guy’s Elizabeth Warren op-ed inspires ‘slap in the face’ meme Today 7:37 AM
- ‘Ask Dr. Ruth’ takes a crowd-pleasing look at her life and groundbreaking career Today 7:30 AM
- Tom Holland and Daisy Ridley’s ‘Chaos Walking’ is so bad it’s ‘unreleasable’ Today 7:01 AM
- The best Westerns on YouTube that you can watch for free Today 7:00 AM
- The shocking similarities between QAnon’s ‘Storm’ and the far-right’s ‘Second Civil War’ Today 6:30 AM
- Healsluts are challenging gaming to make room for queer, kinky self-discovery Today 6:30 AM
- Does ‘Avengers: Endgame’ have a post-credits scene? Today 6:00 AM
- Sling TV Latino es esencial para quienes están hartos de la televisión por cable Today 5:00 AM
- Daenerys’ passive-aggressive smile is a very relatable meme Tuesday 11:18 PM
- Kentucky food truck repurposes ‘LGBTQ’ to support Trump, BBQ Tuesday 8:47 PM
- Trump complains about his Twitter follower count to Jack Dorsey Tuesday 6:34 PM
- ‘Avengers: Endgame’ sticks the devastating landing—and gives you time to grieve Tuesday 5:00 PM
FunnyJunk attorney sues charities to ensure they receive money from The Oatmeal
Attorney Charles Carreon files a lawsuit to make sure Oatmeal creator Matthew Inman and crowdfunding site Indiegogo don’t profit from Inman’s popular fundraiser.
Backed against the wall and facing a mounting army of Internet trolls who will stop at nothing in their quest to ridicule him and digitally vandalize his website and online intellectual property, Internet rights attorney Charles Carreon has decided to sue everybody that he can possibly think to sue.
On Friday, Carreon, the acting attorney for online humor aggregator FunnyJunk, filed a lawsuit against The Oatmeal creator Matthew Inman, crowdfunding platform Indiegogo, and two national charities, the National Wildlife Federation and the American Cancer Society.
The gist: Matthew Inman’s agreement with Indiegogo—started as a response to a lawsuit filed last week by FunnyJunk against Inman, demanding that Inman pay $20,000 if he did not remove statements on his site alleging his comics were ‘being stolen, re-hosted, and monetized on FunnyJunk’s website’—is an illegal contract under California law.
As such, Carreon’s 22-page lawsuit demands that all the money raised through Inman’s high profile BearLove Good. Cancer Bad. project—which currently sits at $179,000 with 8 days left in the campaign—go directly to the two charities it’s meant to benefit.
Essentially, Carreon’s suing to take Inman and Indiegogo out of the financial equation.
Referencing the “Supervision of Trustees and Fundraisers for Charitable Purposes Act,” a California act signed in 1959, Carreon argues that the Golden State requires “all charitable organizations to ‘establish and exercise control’ over their own fundraising activities, and over all fundraising activities conducted by others of their benefit.”
Additionally, charitable organizations bound to California state law must approve all written contracts for fundraising on their behalf. This is likely why fellow crowdfunding platform Kickstarter forbids project creators from hosting charitable fundraisers on its site.
Carreon, who has contributed to the campaign and “made his contribution with the intent to benefit the purposes of the NWF and ACS,” referenced the act because he knew that Inman created BearLove Good. Cancer Bad. in haste and that he likely did not jump through all the necessary hoops to ensure that the fundraiser met all state standards and regulations.
There’s a lot of paperwork that one must file in order to launch a commercial fundraiser for charitable purposes in California: you need to register with the California Attorney General’s Registry of Charitable Trusts; file certain disclosures required by the aforementioned registry; and file a number of annual reports pertaining to annual revenue, fees and commissions charged, and where exactly the money raised will go.
Inman has done none of that, and Carreon believes Inman’s “conduct disparages the image of charitable fundraising” and that he’s not equipped to properly run a commercial fundraiser in the state of California. But his lawsuit is not an effort to shut the fundraiser down. Rather, Carreon hopes to hold Inman accountable, to see it through that neither Inman nor Indiegogo make a profit on the fundraiser.
Carreon’s looking for a 50/50 split of dollars raised through Inman’s Indiegogo campaign, and he wants the money to go directly to the two charities.That means that Inman cannot stand to profit from the fundraiser whatsoever, and that Indiegogo has to forgo the nine percent commission fee the company takes from each successful project.
“Indiegogo has no right to receive 9% of the Charitable Fund, and Inman is not entitled to receive any portion of the Charitable Fund, because they were not registered as a commercial fundraiser, had no written contract with the Charitable Defendants, failed to provide the statutory notice to the Attorney General of prior to its initiation of the Bear Love Campaign,” the lawsuit reads.
Surely, the NWF and ACS are glad to have been roped into this mess. We now wait with bated breath for Inman to post his next inflammatory drawing on The Oatmeal.
Photo via Indiegogo
Chase Hoffberger reported on YouTube, web culture, and crime for the Daily Dot until 2013, when he joined the Austin Chronicle. Until late 2018, he served as that paper’s news editor and reported on criminal justice and politics.