- Nazi troll pretending to be antifa in Portland gets outed by internet 7 Years Ago
- ‘Dear White People’ season 3 reflects the exhaustion of the times—for better or for worse 7 Years Ago
- ‘Seinfeld’ and ‘Friends’ fans feud over which sitcom is better 7 Years Ago
- Anti-abortion centers are getting around Google’s misinformation policy 7 Years Ago
- Twitter, Facebook remove Chinese accounts spreading Hong Kong misinformation 7 Years Ago
- ‘Mindhunter’ season 2 offers no happy endings Today 3:19 PM
- How to watch ‘The Righteous Gemstones’ online Today 3:03 PM
- ‘Mindhunter’ season 2 brings out the memes Today 2:59 PM
- Rumor suggests the X-Men might battle the Avengers on-screen Today 2:54 PM
- The CDC is investigating cases of severe lung damage linked to vaping Today 2:08 PM
- How to stream the 49ers vs. Broncos on (preseason) Monday Night Football Today 1:24 PM
- Trump thinks Google made 16 million people vote for Clinton Today 12:54 PM
- Danny McBride’s ‘The Righteous Gemstones’ is a wicked televangelist comedy Today 12:46 PM
- Facebook-branded coffee shops are coming Today 12:36 PM
- Twitter hosts China-backed ads maligning Hong Kong protesters Today 12:27 PM
Facebook is not the place to serve legal papers, federal judge rules
A New York District Court judge tells Chase Bank that delivering legal notices via social networking sites won’t cut it.
A federal judge has been forced to make an unusual ruling: No, Chase Bank, you can’t serve legal papers through Facebook.
Chase hired a private investigator to track down New York native Nicole Fortunado, who allegedly committed credit card fraud under her estranged mother’s name. But all the PI could come up with was a Facebook account that seemed to belong to Fortunado.
According to New York law, legal papers are supposed to be served in person whenever possible. But when doing so is “impracticable,” a court can allow alternate means, like posting a notice in a local newspaper.
However, as judge John Keenan noted, the law states that service of process must give a defendant a chance to object, and there wasn’t proof that the Facebook account even belonged to Fortunado.
“Chase has not set forth any facts that would give the Court a degree of certainty that the Facebook profile its investigator located is in fact maintained by Nicole,” Keenan ruled.
“The Court’s understanding is that anyone can make a Facebook profile using real, fake, or incomplete information,” he added.
Keenan ruled that Chase will have to serve notice by the more traditional means of taking ads out in local newspapers. Instead of the standard minimum of two papers, however, he insisted Chase put ads in five papers, one in each of the cities where the PI thought he had a lead on Fortunado.
Though there’s precedent in England and Australia for serving legal papers through Facebook, Keenan said he’d never heard of doing so in the U.S.
Trying to do so is “unorthodox, to say the least,” he said.
Photo by partymonstrrrr
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.