- Netflix will remove controversial disaster footage from ‘Bird Box’ Sunday 4:04 PM
- J.K. Rowling’s latest ‘Fantastic Beasts’ reveal is bringing the memes Sunday 3:01 PM
- President Trump calls for government agencies to ‘look into’ ‘Saturday Night Live’ Sunday 12:18 PM
- How to stream Michael Conlan vs. Ruben Garcia Hernandez for free Sunday 11:00 AM
- ‘Pet Sematary’ is a bloodless remake of a Stephen King classic Sunday 10:50 AM
- Here’s the Marvel movie order list you didn’t know you needed Sunday 9:59 AM
- Where do 2020 Democratic candidates stand on weed? Sunday 7:00 AM
- How to stream ‘Billions’ season 4 for free Sunday 6:30 AM
- If you’re not using Vudu, you’re missing out Sunday 6:00 AM
- Everything you need to know about WhatsApp Sunday 5:30 AM
- ‘The Inventor: Out for Blood in Silicon Valley’ tries to get a read on Elizabeth Holmes Saturday 1:57 PM
- ‘Band Together with Logic’ shows us the best of the Internet Saturday 1:32 PM
- How to watch Spence vs. Garcia online Saturday 12:00 PM
- Far-right Australian politician gets egged by teen on video Saturday 11:28 AM
- Inside the solar-powered van that’s recording your favorite bands Saturday 10:48 AM
How else were they supposed to spread the message?
Maybe it’s just censored boobs all the way down.
Facebook blocked the American Civil Liberties Union because of its blog post condemning censorship of a statue of a naked woman.
Then, for good measure, it banned the ACLU from posting for 24 hours.
The statue in question is called “Accept or Reject,” and since 2011 it’s stood near the Overland Park Arboretum and Botanical Gardens, outside of Kansas City. Cast in bronze, it depicts a woman, wearing only an unbuttoned shirt, taking a selfie of her non-existent head.
But the area’s American Family Association has argued for more than a year that that’s one headless, bronze, naked, selfie-taking woman too many for the area, and has sought to get it removed from the public park. As is his wont, ACLU staff attorney Lee Rowland wrote that, contrary to the American Family Association’s accusation, “Accept or Reject” doesn’t fit the legal definition of obscenity.
It does, however, apparently fit Facebook’s. To be fair, the company does have a history of problems with boobs, having previously censored women breastfeeding, women with tattoos over mastectomy scars, and women whose elbows look like boobs at the right angle.
Sometime between Friday and Sunday, Rowland posted his rebuttal to the ACLU’s page on Facebook—”a link to the blog post and a photo of the statue in question,” he wrote. On Tuesday, the ACLU’s digital media associate discovered the ACLU as an organization was fully blocked from posting for 24 hours, as punishment.
Facebook’s policy forbids “pornographic content,” but it allows “content of personal importance,” including “photos of a sculpture like Michelangelo’s David.”
Contacted by the Daily Dot, a Facebook spokesperson said: “Our team processes hundreds of thousands of reports each week and we occasionally make a mistake. In this case, we mistakenly removed content from the ACLU’s page and worked to rectify the mistake as soon as we were notified.”
Indeed, the post went back up on Wednesday. Boobs and all.
Illustration by Jason Reed
A former senior politics reporter for the Daily Dot, Kevin Collier focuses on privacy, cybersecurity, and issues of importance to the open internet. Since leaving the Daily Dot in March 2016, he has served as a reporter for Vocativ and a cybersecurity correspondent for BuzzFeed.