- Deepfake-style videos can now be made with just a single image 5 Years Ago
- The Lonely Island’s ‘Bash Brothers’ is what Netflix should be doing with short-form comedy 5 Years Ago
- ‘Green dress lady’ proves green screen memes are still going strong 5 Years Ago
- ‘Bowling alley strike screen’ memes are bizarre and wonderful Today 12:40 PM
- TikTok star Mohit Mor shot and killed Today 12:00 PM
- Stephen A. Smith is baby Today 11:43 AM
- Tfue releases statement on FaZe Clan lawsuit, says his contract is ‘f*cked’ Today 11:34 AM
- People are using an app to out gropers on Japan’s subway Today 11:24 AM
- Trump misspelled ‘accomplishments’ on handwritten notes, photo shows Today 11:12 AM
- HUD proposal would allow homeless shelters to refuse trans people Today 10:44 AM
- Disney’s ‘Aladdin’ remake isn’t terrible Today 10:11 AM
- Police under investigation after running over 1-year-old child Today 9:16 AM
- Who is Jannah, the breakout star of ‘Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker’? Today 9:10 AM
- Trump revives his ‘dumb as a rock’ insult for Rex Tillerson Today 9:03 AM
- Forget Hot Jafar. All hail Fat Ursula Today 8:14 AM
The ‘Sports Illustrated’ Barbie cover: Stupid mistake or calculated trolling?
The Swimsuit Issue has never really featured realistic bodies, but at least it’s featured real women.
Sports Illustrated’s annual Swimsuit Issue has become a tradition, but as attitudes and views change, the publication has had to think of new ways to to get readers and publicity. And for their new 50th anniversary issue, which hits stands Feb. 18, the tactic is apparently trolling.
On the cover is not a model, but Barbie, “the doll that started it all.” The image will appear on limited edition covers of Sports Illustrated, and Mattel’s pushing a campaign called “Unapologetic,” as a way to counter arguments of negative body image and body-shaming. This is also likely a push for business, since Barbie’s relevance has dissipated over the last decade, and sales of the doll dropped last year. As a pushback, the doll will be featured in a four-page “spread.”
— Barbie (@Barbie) February 12, 2014
A Mattel spokeswoman told Ad Age that Barbie is a legend on par with real supermodels like Christie Brinkley and Heidi Klum, one whose image has held influence over the last 50 years:
“As a legend herself, and under criticism about her body and how she looks, posing in ‘Sports Illustrated Swimsuit’ gives Barbie and her fellow legends an opportunity to own who they are, celebrate what they have done, and be unapologetic.”
In a recent interview with Fast Company, Kim Culmone, Barbie’s VP of design, claimed “Barbie’s body was never designed to be realistic. She was designed for girls to easily dress and undress. And she’s had many bodies over the years, ones that are poseable, ones that are cut for princess cuts, ones that are more realistic.”
The Swimsuit Issue has never really featured realistic bodies, but at least it’s featured real women. It’s existed as a pop-culture reference, and Mattel is attempting to position Barbie as a cultural icon that speaks to multiple generations. That’s a fair enough point: She’s endured five generations as a brand.
This still feels like a missed opportunity, on the 50th anniversary of the issue, for Sports Illustrated to perhaps explore the editorial history of the issue and the women involved, or highlight advances in cultural diversity and gender identity that have occurred in the last 50 years. There’s also the fact that this issue is being released during the Winter Olympics, one which boasts numerous accomplished female athletes.
Instead of doing something edgy or innovative, Sports Illustrated instead focused on an impossibly-figured doll that’s generated plenty of controversy, one that its own designer claimed is made to be dressed and undressed. Just last month, Apple pulled a controversial plastic surgery app aimed at kids called “Plastic Surgery & Plastic Doctor & Plastic Hospital Office for Barbie Version,” in which the user is prompted to resculpt the “Barbie” body into something more appealing.
That #Unapologetic mantra could be seen as a pushback against criticism, but why not address that criticism in a more engaging way? More likely, it’s simply a way for Mattel and Sports Illustrated, two companies that have never been that feminist- or body-positive, to drum up business and publicity via controversy and outrage. And they don’t seem unapologetic for that either.
Image via Tracheotomy Bob/Flickr
Audra Schroeder is the Daily Dot’s senior entertainment writer, and she focuses on streaming, comedy, and music. Her work has previously appeared in the Austin Chronicle, the Dallas Observer, NPR, ESPN, Bitch, and the Village Voice. She is based in Austin, Texas.