- Hong Kong protesters wear LeBron James masks Wednesday 7:58 PM
- Gina Rodriguez has said N-word before, Twitter discovers Wednesday 6:54 PM
- How to stream Chiefs vs. Broncos on Thursday Night Football Wednesday 6:00 PM
- Feds take down dark web’s largest known child porn site Wednesday 5:33 PM
- Ben Shapiro says his ‘man body’ is just as controlled as women’s Wednesday 5:06 PM
- Genius turns Kylie Jenner’s ‘rise and shine’ meme into alarm ringtone Wednesday 4:14 PM
- In ‘Tell Me Who I Am,’ twin brothers grapple with hidden trauma Wednesday 4:13 PM
- Panama Papers law firm sues Netflix over ‘The Laundromat’ Wednesday 3:07 PM
- ‘Motherless Brooklyn’ is a gorgeous noir with little below the surface Wednesday 1:14 PM
- Jameela Jamil and Sara Sampaio got in a Twitter feud over ‘long-starved’ models Wednesday 12:52 PM
- Freddie Prinze Jr. will straight-up school you about the Force don’t @ him Wednesday 12:18 PM
- Woman hosts Instagram funeral after she ‘killed’ $102K in student debt Wednesday 11:45 AM
- YouTube beats Netflix as go-to streaming platform for teens Wednesday 11:41 AM
- The tallest man in America posts emotional YouTube video from hospital room Wednesday 11:31 AM
- Nintendo Switch subreddit implodes amid Hong Kong protests Wednesday 11:14 AM
Best Flickr alternatives for photographers
Now that Yahoo wants to sell your Flickr photos, here are other options.
Yahoo wants to make money off photos people have been using for free for years. The company recently announced it’s going to start selling photos on Flickr that are licensed for commercial use under Creative Commons.
Photographers use the commercial Creative Commons license as a way to let other artists, publishers, designers, or businesses use their work for free, even if it’s work they plan on selling or using in advertising. Yahoo will now take 50 million commercially licensed works and sell them—without giving the photographers any profits.
Yahoo is also selling hand-selected pieces from photographers through its Flickr Marketplace and those photographers will receive 51 percent of net sales.
“When Flickr decided to sell the photos outright with no cut to the people who took the photos, it struck me as something not part of Creative Commons, but purely parasitic,” William Pietri, a San Francisco-based developer said in an interview with the Daily Dot.
In response, Pietri removed Creative Commons licensing from all his photos, which are now designated “All Rights Reserved.” Others across the Internet are doing the same, or leaving the photo-sharing site altogether.
If you’re a photographer who wants to let others use your work, but don’t want to have Yahoo making money for photos you shot, there are a few alternatives.
On deviantART, you can upload your photos, graphics, or any other art and license it for Creative Commons use. Over 150,000 art works are uploaded each day, and millions of those are licensed for commercial use.
Photographers can use 500px to store, share, and sell photography, while also licensing some as commercial under Creative Commons for others to use. The company told the Wall Street Journal that they do not sell works that are licensed commercially.
The database of over 20 million photos are free for anyone to use, and for anyone to contribute to. Wikimedia Commons also has a monthly photo challenge to help photographers find inspiration and improve their skills.
While there’s still some confusion about what Google+ actually is, the photo-sharing and storage options on the social network are robust. You can save your full resolution images for free up to 30GB, or pay $10/month for 1TB. While Google+ does not have the option to label as Creative Commons automatically, you can do so in the image description.
Yahoo’s decision to sell Creative Commons photos isn’t illegal—the license says photos designated for commercial use can be used for any purpose, including being sold by a company like Yahoo—but it’s not in the spirit of the license, Pietri said. And it’s just the latest move by Yahoo to upset the Flickr community, some of which have thousands of photos stored after years of contributing to Flickr.
“If it were some random bottom-feeder on the Internet, I wouldn’t care—but this is Flickr, this is Yahoo,” Pietri said. “They should know better.”
Photo by wka/Flickr (CC BY SA 2.0)
Selena Larson is a technology reporter based in San Francisco who writes about the intersection of technology and culture. Her work explores new technologies and the way they impact industries, human behavior, and security and privacy. Since leaving the Daily Dot, she's reported for CNN Money and done technical writing for cybersecurity firm Dragos.