- The ’24 hours to respond’ meme holds celebrities to a higher standard Monday 8:46 PM
- Twitter users miss the kids who walked in on their dad’s interview Monday 8:40 PM
- ‘The Thing About Men’ Twitter hashtag is full of sarcasm and misogyny Monday 7:27 PM
- This woman said Hillary Clinton losing the 2016 election gave her PTSD, and people are furious Monday 6:45 PM
- Vanessa Bryant files a lawsuit against helicopter company after deaths of Kobe and Gianna Monday 5:49 PM
- Michael Jordan cries at Kobe Bryant memorial, jokes about creating a new meme Monday 4:43 PM
- Woman’s boyfriend says it’s him or the frogs—Reddit says choose the frogs Monday 4:22 PM
- Greyhound buses will no longer allow Border Patrol checks Monday 4:04 PM
- ‘Eat Them To Defeat Them’ is oddly about vegetables—not about eating the rich Monday 3:26 PM
- Marco Rubio mocked for filming talking while driving socialism critique Monday 2:54 PM
- QAnon believer asks Trump’s campaign press secretary who Q is Monday 2:36 PM
- Octavia Spencer has discovered ‘Ma’ memes—and she can’t get enough Monday 2:09 PM
- Meet the anti-Greta Thunberg, a climate ‘skeptic’ funded by the oil industry Monday 1:12 PM
- Harvey Weinstein convicted of rape and sexual assault Monday 12:56 PM
- Senator calls Facebook’s current election disinformation efforts ‘inadequate’ in letter Monday 12:11 PM
The AP Stylebook’s latest change is wrong, but that’s never mattered less
Over? More than? There’s more than meets the eye to the latest linguistic meltdown.
The Associated Press Stylebook has long been a bible of sorts for journalists, helping news outlets maintain correct and consistent formatting, punctuation, grammar, datelines, and much more. So every update to its contents has a telling ripple effect in the media world—especially when a cherished rule of thumb is overwritten. It’s as if the world’s semantic bedrock has quaked.
Take the distinction between “more than” and “over,” first drawn in 1877 by the New York Evening Post’s William Cullens Bryant. The editor never did explain to anyone’s satisfaction why he hated seeing the word “over” appear before a numeral (as in a clause like “over 50,000 fans attended the game”), but nevertheless, it was enshrined as axiomatic tradition, and quickly became second nature to anyone writing for an American newspaper.
As you might imagine, today’s reporters were aghast to hear that they had adapted to this style guideline for naught: the two phrases can now be used interchangeably. Most of the time.
— Katie Niederee (@katieniederee) March 20, 2014
Breathing into a paper bag RT @RindelsAP Exciting upcoming AP Stylebook change: We can use “over” as well as “more than” for greater value
— Neal J. Riley (@realdealneal) March 20, 2014
— Mike Shor (@MikeShor) March 20, 2014
I will never get more than this @APstylebook change
— Joel Pavelski (@joelcifer) March 20, 2014
Exciting upcoming AP Stylebook change http://t.co/CBgbYXLuuN
— Jon Eiseman (@Jon_Eiseman) March 20, 2014
Weird that the AP is making you take a selfie and insert it into every place you’d normally put a comma???
— Caroline Moss (@socarolinesays) March 20, 2014
That last tweet obliquely acknowledges another change to The AP Stylebook, one that reveals just how far behind the curve such reference materials have fallen: the addition of the term “selfie,” which was already the Oxford English Dictionary’s word of the year. It was only a couple of years ago, too, that the AP first allowed us to type “email” and “website” instead of the jarringly dated “e-mail” and “Web site.” (“Web” is still capitalized when standalone.)
AP Style tip: New to the Stylebook: selfie – a self-portrait photo taken with a phone or webcam and shared over a social network. #ACES2014
— AP Stylebook (@APStylebook) March 20, 2014
But because “over” vs. “more than” was an arbitrary rule to begin with, reinforced by decades of “that’s how it is”; because the AP is apparently evolving into a descriptive guide that captures how people write as opposed to telling them how they ought to; and because so many of its original recommendations are geared toward the peculiar concision, voice, and needs of newspapers, not websites, blogs, or social media, we might ask what the big deal is.
After all, the typical Daily Dot article has to go above and beyond the advice of the AP as a matter of course. We’ve had to make our own judgments on how to style terms like “subreddit,” “Dogecoin,” “@-replies,” and “Dick Butt.” We simply don’t have the time to wait for an authority figure’s final assessments on such things—nor are we likely to get any. We even diverge from the AP when it suits us, dropping periods into “a.k.a.,” contra its suggestion.
You can read the freakout over such updates, then, as no more than professional crankiness. Journalists love their systems, their routines, and, above all, their accepted wisdom. The beauty of the AP Stylebook is that you never have to ask why a prescription has been handed down; all you need to do is adhere. In effect, the only complaint to be made here is that the next generation of writers won’t have the “more than” dictum drilled into their heads by a bellowing copy chief, which many would consider a right of passage. You know, like hazing.
Besides, both sides are wrong on this: You should use “in excess of.”
Photo by Drew Coffman/Flickr
Miles Klee is a novelist and web culture reporter. The former editor of the Daily Dot’s Unclick section, Klee’s essays, satire, and fiction have appeared in Lapham’s Quarterly, Vanity Fair, 3:AM, Salon, the Awl, the New York Observer, the Millions, and the Village Voice. He's the author of two odd books of fiction, 'Ivyland' and 'True False.'