BY ANTONIS POLEMITIS

World governments announced a plan today to allow citizens to anonymously carry parts of their wealth on their person and exchange it with others using small pieces of colorful paper printed with nationalistic and Masonic imagery along with numbers that purportedly represent the amount of wealth each piece of paper represents (if the paper is not a counterfeit). These pieces of paper are formally a "note" from each nation's central bank, but they are also called "cash" by many. This is a technical matter that is too complex to cover in our basic primer. Suffice it to say, that it is representative of the complexity and user-unfriendliness of this new system.

‘Bills’: A complex construct

These pieces of papers (also known as “bills,” "dollar bills," "George Washingtons," or "Dead Presidents" among the shadowy community of anti-banking libertarians who have been the primary users of cash to date) will differ from country to country and are not redeemable outside national borders.    

In what will come as a surprise to generations who have grown up with calculators and computers, ‘bills’ only come in fixed denominations, requiring users to maintain a large number of these pieces of paper that must be aggregated to execute a transaction and then re-aggregated to ‘make change,’ a complex process of returning to the payee the excess of the payment using yet other bills. (Don’t worry if this sounds complex; we had trouble understanding it ourselves at first and it is certainly not ready for the average consumer in its current form.)  

Mike Smith, VP of employee training at Sears has said: “I cannot imagine training tens of thousands of our employees to use cash, verify that it is genuine and learn to ‘make change’ without making errors. This is going to require a wholesale installation of special change-making hardware—the so-called ‘cash registers’—and millions of dollars of employee training, while creating long lines and delays for consumers. Furthermore, we would need to adopt new security procedures and armed guards to avoid theft of the physical bills while in the store or during transport to our bank. We can’t see ourselves adopting cash under these conditions.”
 
Perfect for criminals

The launch of cash has provoked an immediate reaction from law-enforcement agencies worldwide that universally condemned the development.

“Cash is a 100% anonymous and untraceable payments technology. It is like a weapon of mass destruction launched against law enforcement,” said Mike Smith, the recently confirmed FBI director. “It is the perfect payment mechanism for criminals, drug cartels, terrorists, prostitution rings and money launderers. We don’t know how we will be able to combat such a technology and fully expect that a new generation of super-criminals will emerge, working in the shadows of a world where they can conduct their illicit affairs without leaving a trace.” 

Banking Superintendent of New York State, Mike Smith had the following to say: “I can’t think of any reason that a law-abiding individual would want to use cash. At a bare minimum, we believe there should be a licensing procedure for individuals or businesses that plan to use cash, a ‘Cash-License’ as it were. This license will limit ‘cash’ to trust-worthy individuals who keep detailed auditable records of all their cash transactions in order to keep New York safe from criminals.”

Others have concerns about forgery and counterfeiting. “Ultimately, even with all the fancy inks, cash is just a piece of paper. We fully expect criminal groups and rogue nation states to print fake cash in order to profit or to disrupt the economies of their enemies,” said Mike Smith, an analyst at Stratfor. “In the interim, we are certain that cash will trade a discount in the real-world, given the risk to a counterparty of accepting a forged piece of paper; no doubt cash is a huge step back from the modern cryptography in place throughout our current financial system.”

No consumer protection

Though hard to imagine, cash operates with no consumer protection at all. If your ‘bills’ are stolen or lost, they are gone forever.

“I just don’t understand why there is nobody that I can call to reinstate my cash if I lose it,” says Mike Smith, a businessman from Toledo. “What type of idiotic wealth and payment system doesn’t maintain transaction and ownership records?” 

Moreover, there appears to be no authentication mechanism associated with cash payments or transfers, let alone one that matches modern security standards. Once someone has gained physical control of your ‘bills,’ they are free to spend or use them as they wish and there is no way to reverse the transaction, stop them or even identify who has stolen them.

Even simple destruction of the bill, which, as you recall, is just a piece of paper, could result in losses. According to the director of the newly founded “Bureau of Engraving and Printing,” mutilated ‘bills’ that are more than 51% destroyed must be mailed in for a special investigation that will determine if they will be replaced or not.

Recommended 'hardware wallets' found to have security flaws

Proponents of cash have dismissed these concerns saying that various hardware manufacturers such as “Coach” and “Gucci” will shortly be releasing “hardware wallets” in leather and suede. These wallets are meant to hold the bills and fit into a pants pocket or purse.

“Once your bills are safely ensconced in your Gucci wallet and securely placed in your pants pocket [the front pocket is recommended as a ‘best practice’ for security], it is almost impossible for them to be stolen, lost or destroyed” said Mike Smith, VP of communications for Gucci NA.

But some early adopters have reported that the hardware wallets have security flaws. “I was out in Bangkok two weeks ago at a bar and I forgot my Gucci wallet there,” said Mike Smith, a visiting tourist. “When I returned the next morning, my wallet was there but my cash was gone!” We contacted Gucci regarding this hacking attack, but a spokesperson would not comment “about confidential customer financial matters.”

Even criminals have not been immune to the risks of cash. The notorious Silk Road drug-dealing marketplace, where vendors and customers left envelopes full of cash (on which they had very clearly written their names) in an anonymous drop-box that managed the exchange, mysteriously closed last week, citing ‘theft of the cash due to a bug in the envelope sealing process.’ While technical experts believe that might be possible that the glue on the envelope was not correctly applied, they also warn that a ‘bill’ is basically a private and public key at the same time and note that there might be dangers involved in letting anonymous criminals hold the private keys to your wealth.

Requires physical presence

In what might be the most unusual limitation on cash, it only works for payments within 36 inches or less (or the so-called “arm’s length transaction” as hackers in the community have colorfully titled it) as it has to be handed from one (human) party to another to execute the transaction.

This requirement is widely thought to be a fatal flaw of cash by traditionalists.

Mike Smith, VP of retail banking at Chase said: “A form of payment that cannot be used at a distance, cannot be used for e-commerce, cannot be used by mobile devices, cannot be used for machine based transactions, cannot be scripted or programmed, cannot be thought of as a payment system. I will admit, as a form of performance art, cash transactions are an amusing experiment, but this has no applicability in the real world of banking, finance or commerce.  

Furthermore, given cash’s association with criminal activities, we will be refusing to offer banking services and terminating the accounts of any customer that uses ‘cash’ in a business or personal capacity. It is the only way we can ensure we remain compliant with our regulatory obligations.”

Remarkably, if you attempt to use cash in a different country from the one that issued it, it will categorically be rejected. In order to use cash abroad, you will have to go to designated points, usually in airports or certain banks, with limited hours of operation, that will “exchange” your bills for bills of the country that you are visiting. These exchanges have high fees—usually 2-3 percent for each exchange, meaning that tourist will lose  percent of their cash or more on a typical trip just in these ‘exchange’ costs, which seems extraordinarily high for what is, ultimately, an exercise in multiplication or division.

A step backward for economics

Economists are flabbergasted that lawmakers have allowed cash to be adopted, despite their strong objections. A key policy tool of Central Banks has been the use of positive and negative interest rates to manage economic growth. It appears that this will not be possible with cash.

Mike Smith, a leading economics blogger for the NY Times said “This is a sad day for macro-economics.  If cash ever catches on in any meaningful sense, it will reduce our control over the levers of the economy significantly by providing a mechanism for depositors to opt out of negative interest rates. Given the fact that it might keep us from preventing the next depression and will definitely reduce tax collections, one could even consider it ‘evil.’”

Environment and health impacts

Environmentalists expressed concerns about the impact of cash on the environment.  “You would have thought that in 2014, we would have moved beyond pesticide and water intensive cotton farming [retracted: cutting down trees], treating the cotton with dangerous inks and transporting it with fossil fuels, only to represent a value like “20” that can be represented electronically at effectively no cost. When will we ever learn?” said Mike Smith, recently appointed executive director of the Sierra Club.

Public health officials also warned that cash could be an excellent vector for disease transmission. “We tested several ‘bills’ in our labs recently and discovered that the average bill has 20 times more bacteria than a toilet seat,” said Mike Smith, a VP of research at the Mayo Clinic. “Our advice is that people should avoid cash in general and only handle it if absolutely necessary.   Children, the elderly and immuno-compromised individuals should not handle cash under any circumstances.”

What comes next?

Proponents of ‘cash’ think it will ultimately be a widely adopted technology that will spread around the world, enabling in-person mid-tier transactions (not micro-payments, but not mega-payments either) in a manner that is invulnerable to electric or internet outages and that will usher in a new era of more ‘human’ commerce.

We try to keep an open mind at this publication toward new technology, but to date, we have a hard time seeing the positive case for cash.  Certainly criminal groups will take advantage of cash’s perfect anonymity to wreak havoc on law enforcement and tax collection, something that is deeply undesirable. Among law-abiding citizens, we can envision some possible adoption in dense urban hipster communities like Williamsburg where ‘wallets,’ ‘cash,’ and ‘making change’ could be yet another reflection of their tongue-in-cheek view of modern societal systems.

Other than that, it would be hard to recommend that the average consumer or merchant becomes involved in what is still today a very buggy system, filled with risk, inconvenience, high transaction costs, and possible disease transmission.  Even if handled perfectly, cash will certainly tar your business and personal life with the seedy reputation of the drug dealers, terrorists, money launderers and anti-establishment anarchists who use it today, threatening business and banking relationships and raising eyebrows among law enforcement and your community.

This story was originally published by Ledra Capital, a multi-generational privately held group focused on growing great organizations, with a particular emphasis on higher education, media, and technology in the Eastern Mediterranean. You can read its full Bitcoin series here

Photo by Ben K Adams/Flickr (CC BY-ND 2.0)