- Samuel L. Jackson roasts ‘Spider-Man’ marketing gaffe 7 Months Ago
- Trump cites long-dead ayatollah while announcing Iran sanction 7 Months Ago
- Why a far-right conspiracy about Ilhan Omar is in the news again Today 7:46 AM
- Razer publicly shames female influencer who tweeted about being sexually harassed Today 7:45 AM
- You can now perform Marvel plays with your school theater group Today 6:54 AM
- Trans/Sex: Strap-ons for trans women, inclusive porn games, and online dating Today 6:30 AM
- Why UFC 239 may be the PPV event of the year Today 6:00 AM
- Twitter lifts ‘permanent’ suspension of activist Barrett Brown Monday 5:52 PM
- Billie Eilish fans fend off objectifying comments on tank top photo Monday 5:32 PM
- Groom’s mother sabotages wedding by tricking guests into wearing jorts and hoodies Monday 4:39 PM
- No one believes Bill de Blasio’s son sent him these debate prep texts Monday 3:26 PM
- Meek Mill, Jay-Z to release ‘Free Meek’ documentary on Amazon Prime Monday 3:20 PM
- 3 ways to secure your Nest cameras Monday 3:15 PM
- This Pokémon generator site is creating hilarious monsters Monday 2:48 PM
- MrBeast impersonator tricks kid into destroying his XBox Monday 12:50 PM
Photo via Ginny/Wikimedia (CC-BY-SA)
What about anti-book language??
Yesterday, a chart shared on Twitter by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) was thoroughly mocked for imploring people to use animal-friendly language in popular idioms. One of the items on the chart suggested that people say “feed two birds with one scone” instead of “kill two birds with one stone.” Another revision? “Bring home the bagels” instead of “bring home the bacon.”
“Words matter, and as our understanding of social justice evolves, our language evolves along with it. Here’s how to remove speciesism from your daily conversations,” PETA wrote in the tweet that included the chart.
PETA likely knew what it was doing in sharing the chart; the organization’s ads seem designed to attract attention, whether it’s positive or negative. But PETA apparently forgot the golden rule of sharing an image of a chart or a sign on Twitter: People will meme it. Over the last day, parodies of PETA’s “anti-animal language” chart have popped up on the site.
Here’s the original version, for reference:
Words matter, and as our understanding of social justice evolves, our language evolves along with it. Here’s how to remove speciesism from your daily conversations. pic.twitter.com/o67EbBA7H4
— PETA: Bringing Home the Bagels Since 1980 (@peta) December 4, 2018
Here’s a meme of the chart, which suggests people say “hydrated, comfortable dog” instead of “hot dog” and “all cats are immortal” instead of “Cats have nine lives”:
i mean this getting to be a lot pic.twitter.com/tS9haMY0WG
— seb foxallen (@purpledocket) December 5, 2018
Okay, this one is fair pic.twitter.com/WZ0qVPo7zv
— a very pixelated boat christmas (@pixelatedboat) December 5, 2018
Why stop at expressions involving animals, though? What about books?
This chart says people should say “the oldest treat in the book” instead of “the oldest trick in the book”:
Just as it became unacceptable to use racist, homophobic, or ableist language, phrases that trivialise cruelty to books will vanish as more people appreciate books for what they are. pic.twitter.com/PDDdmgyO8o
— WaterstonesTCR (@WaterstonesTCR) December 5, 2018
And what about….games?
— Jules (@Julian_Epp) December 6, 2018
This chart mocks the War on Christmas Language:
Stop using anti-Christmas language pic.twitter.com/Yn8ulPcy4q
— jacksfilms (@jacksfilms) December 5, 2018
PETA doesn’t seem to mind all the jokes about its chart. The organization changed its display name to “PETA: Bringing Home the Bagels Since 1980.” Well, at least PETA is self-aware.
Tiffany Kelly is the Unclick editor at Daily Dot. Previously, she worked at Ars Technica and Wired. Her writing has appeared in several other print and online publications, including the Los Angeles Times, Popular Mechanics, and GQ.