- Camila María Concepcíon, trans activist and Netflix writer, dies at 28 Thursday 5:46 PM
- Chrissy Teigen calls out fan who made weird comment about her daughter’s feet Thursday 4:57 PM
- TikTok’s ‘clean queen’ says videos are helping her figure out ‘adulting’ Thursday 4:12 PM
- Clearview clients include ICE, Macy’s, Best Buy, leaked data reveals Thursday 4:08 PM
- Women are clamoring to get their photos on a Twitter feed of ‘hot mugshots’ Thursday 4:06 PM
- ‘Love Is Blind’ finale: Somehow, real love emerged from this dystopian setting Thursday 3:57 PM
- Creator of ‘Say So’ TikTok dance appears in Doja Cat music video Thursday 3:51 PM
- Is TikTok’s algorithm actually pretty racist? Thursday 3:45 PM
- Fans freaking out over ‘Say My Name’ horror remix featured in Jordan Peele’s ‘Candyman’ Thursday 3:33 PM
- CDC graphic warns most facial hair isn’t compatible with coronavirus protection measures Thursday 1:31 PM
- Tutoring website refuses to take down ad sexualizing Asian women Thursday 1:24 PM
- MSNBC pundit loses air time after saying Sanders staffers are ‘island of misfit Black girls’ Thursday 12:36 PM
- Court says YouTube isn’t subject to First Amendment scrutiny Thursday 11:06 AM
- Russian models are Instagramming life in Wuhan Thursday 11:00 AM
- Hilary Duff suggests ‘Lizzie McGuire’ revival was halted over adult storylines Thursday 10:37 AM
That epic Wikipedia “Star Trek” edit is still screwing up Google
The negative effects of the crowd-sourced encyclopedia’s excessive, mistaken pedantry can linger for months. Just ask Google.
After 40,000 words and months of argument, common sense can eventually prevail on Wikipedia. But the effects of the crowd-sourced encyclopedia’s excessive, mistaken pedantry can linger for months afterward. Just ask Google.
For months, Wikipedians argued over a single bit of style in the title of the new Star Trek movie. The film is called Star Trek Into Darkness. For reasons that remain impenetrable to most neutral observers, Wikipedians changed the name to Star Trek into Darkness (usually written as Star Trek Into Darkness). They replaced a capital “I” with a lowercase “i.”
Eventually, after some less-than-flattering media attention, a brave Wikipedia editor made an executive decision and reverted the entry back to the actual movie title. In the end, sanity won out.
Unfortunately, Google’s poor inhuman algorithm is still living in the past, unaware of that moment of Wikipedia bravery.
Anyone who searches for the movie on the world’s most popular search engine will be fed back the inaccurate title.
It looks like this:
In other words, the arguments of a small group of pedantic editors on Wikipedia has more influence over Google—the most popular website in the world—than the movie’s own creators. On Wikipedia, small mistakes really do matter. And not just when they’re about capital letters.
Google isn’t the only company or person to take the encyclopedia’s facts at face value. Just last year, a prominent British judge embarrassed himself after parroting false information from Wikipedia in a high-profile report.
Photo via x-ray delta one/Flickr
Kevin Morris is a veteran web reporter and editor who specializes in longform journalism. He led the Daily Dot’s esports vertical and, following its acquisition by GAMURS in late 2016, launched Dot Esports, where he serves as the site’s editor-in-chief.