- Reddit just banned the NBA Streams subreddit 4 Years Ago
- How to watch ‘Drunk History’ for free 4 Years Ago
- Netflix’s ‘Unit 42’ soars on the chemistry of its unlikely lead partners 4 Years Ago
- How to watch ‘Good Trouble’ for free Today 7:00 AM
- It’s time for Pete Buttigieg to claim his status as Short King Today 6:30 AM
- The best foreign-language TV shows on Netflix Today 6:00 AM
- Hasan Minhaj explains why your internet sucks in ‘Patriot Act’ episode, puts it on DVD Monday 8:41 PM
- Hackers got control of Dylan Sprouse’s Twitter account, posted offensive content Monday 7:38 PM
- Twitch is suing the trolls who flooded the platform with porn and Christchurch shooting footage Monday 6:55 PM
- Cat filter turns Pakistani politicians’ press conference into frisky business Monday 6:12 PM
- Couple calls for boycott of dog walker app Wag! after their dog was abducted Monday 5:07 PM
- Trump gets banned from SeekingArrangement because he’s not a ‘real sugar daddy’ Monday 4:17 PM
- InfoWars accidentally sent child porn to lawyers representing Sandy Hook parents Monday 4:12 PM
- Sticker warns men changing diapers about ‘feminization of the American male’ Monday 4:10 PM
- The genius way Genius caught Google allegedly stealing lyrics Monday 3:03 PM
The founder of Tor Books waded into an ongoing battle in the sci-fi community, and no one is happy about it.
In the world of sci-fi/fantasy publishing, all anyone can talk about today is this Tor.com blog post from Tor Books founder Tom Doherty.
The post publicly distances Tor from a Facebook comment made by Irene Gallo, the publisher’s creative director. Written on May 11, Gallo’s comment briefly outlined her opinion of the “Sad/Rabid Puppies” campaign that derailed this year’s Hugo Awards by bloc-voting for a slate of anti-progressive authors.
The Sad Puppies are often compared to Gamergate, though they are not affiliated. In her post, Gallo described the group as “right-wing to neo-nazi” and “unrepentantly racist, misogynist, and homophobic.” Doherty’s post distances Tor from that viewpoint, adding that the Sad Puppies supports a diverse range of authors—including several published by Tor Books.
After Doherty denounced Gallo’s comment, many sci-fi fans and authors began accusing him of hypocrisy. If Gallo’s post was deemed objectionable enough to warrant a public disavowal, what about the controversial opinions published by other Tor authors and employees?
And while he’s at it, Doherty can apologize for Orson Scott Card and John C. Wright, too. As they have engaged in actual hate speech.
— Natalie Luhrs (@eilatan) June 9, 2015
Are you. Fucking. Kidding me.
Shame on you, Tom Doherty. HR policies can be clarified in a way that doesn’t serve the interests of bigots.
— N. K. Jemisin (@nkjemisin) June 9, 2015
While Gallo’s opinions were offensive to some Sad Puppies supporters, it’s unclear why the single-paragraph Facebook comment resulted in such a public response almost a month after it was posted. Other Tor-affiliated writers have posted similar things on social media over the past few months, but none of the comments were addressed on the front page of Tor.com.
So, why did Gallo’s post warrant such attention? It could be because the post was targeted last week by author and right-wing blogger Vox Day, creator of the “Rabid Puppies” slate that swept the Hugo Awards this year. Doherty’s statement doesn’t mention how he came across Gallo’s comment, but it’s unlikely that he stumbled across it at random. (And if he did, he probably had to trip over about hundreds of similar posts from other sci-fi industry people to find it.)
The Daily Dot contacted Tor Books for comment, but the company did not respond.
If there is one thing 26 years in the SFF field has taught me, it is the extent of the double standard imposed on women as compared to men.
— Kate Elliott (@KateElliottSFF) June 9, 2015
Doherty’s response attempted to characterize Tor as a neutral entity in the ongoing culture war within sci-fi fandom. But to some, it felt more like throwing an employee to the wolves.
Others pointed to what they saw as a double standard. While Gallo received a public dressing-down, Tor has been mum on star author John Scalzi calling the Sad Puppies bigots and feuding with Vox Day, and editor Patrick Nielsen Hayden describing the Sad Puppies as “downright evil.”
Nobody was ever confused that Irene Gallo might be “speaking for” Tor Books on her personal Facebook page. Nobody is confused now.
— Scott Lynch (@scottlynch78) June 9, 2015
Regardless of intent, the whole situation has become a mess. Doherty’s decision to single out one person without explanation resulted in an immediate backlash from a crowd of authors and critics.
Doherty’s letter’s bad, but note there are plenty of excellent people (including Irene herself) doing wonderful things for the genre at TOR.
— Saladin Ahmed (@saladinahmed) June 9, 2015
Photo via Alexandre Duret-Lutz/Wikimedia (CC BY-SA 2.0)
Gavia Baker-Whitelaw is a staff writer at the Daily Dot, covering geek culture and fandom. Specializing in sci-fi movies and superheroes, she also appears as a film and TV critic on BBC radio. Elsewhere, she co-hosts the pop culture podcast Overinvested. Follow her on Twitter: @Hello_Tailor