The rise of generative AI has led to a new worst wedding trend as brides grab art without paying and ask ChatGPT to alter it. One TikToker and wedding expert highlighted a video in which a bride demonstrates how she does this, skirting around paying $115 to an artist in order to get a sketch of her venue for free.
This is only adding to the many ways in which artists are losing income thanks to AI.
Brides are using ChatGPT to alter wedding invitations
AI models like ChatGPT have already been widely accused of mass art and writing theft to generate their responses. What Tori Moore (@torimooore) exposed on Thursday seems like an escalation.
Her video shows another TikTok user screensharing to show how she found a drawing of her wedding venue priced at $115. Instead of buying it or contacting the artist to request a different version of the art, she saved and uploaded it to ChatGPT and asked it to generate a sketch-style drawing of the original.
@torimooore stop stealing art! iāve seen several brides post videos about how they take art from etsy or things theyāve seen on TikTok and upload it into ChatGPT to use for their invitations or decor⦠that is theft! and itās insane how normalized itās becoming!!
⬠original sound ā TORI
āItās important to me that you guys know this is stealing,ā said Moore. āThis is an act of theft. And Iām not trying to be dramatic when I say that, but Iāve seen several TikToks of DIY brides stealing peopleās art and uploading it into AI platforms to transform it into something else.ā
āAnd that is stealing from the artist. Thatās theft. Thatās copyright infringement. There are so many layers to why thatās wrong.ā
Whether or not you could legally call this practice theft or copyright infringement is unclear, but what is clear is that the original artist from the DIY bride video did not get paid for her work.
Is it stealing, though?
While most commenters considered the brideās actions morally wrong, some quibbled over whether it was technically illegal.
āIf it is publicly available by searching it and going to images, then that is not stealing,ā said @snorlax_king.

This is not accurate, however, as artists often copyright their work before putting it online.
āThatās not how copyright works,ā user @danialexandriamusic pointed out. āA Disney movie is publicly available does that mean I can do whatever I want with it? Nope.ā
Whether that changes if you ask ChatGPT to alter the image needs to be sorted out by the courts, but plenty of other TikTokers still had strong opinions.

āFor those saying it isnāt stealing because the bride didnāt go on to sell it: someone paid for that commission at some point and that payment would have included usage rights; or, the artist would have been selling the image in some format,ā wrote @megan__gilbert. āEither way, itās misuse of someoneās art and one of those two parties is losing out with things like this.ā
The internet is chaoticābut weāll break it down for you in one daily email. Sign up for the Daily Dotās web_crawlr newsletter here to get the best (and worst) of the internet straight into your inbox.